Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23451258›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2013

Interaction of motor training and intermittent theta burst stimulation in modulating motor cortical plasticity: influence of BDNF Val66Met polymorphism.

Mina Lee, Song E Kim, Won Sup Kim, Jungyeun Lee, Hye Kyung Yoo, Kee-Duk Park, Kyoung-Gyu Choi, Seon-Yong Jeong, Byung Gon Kim, Hyang Woon Lee

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Assessing the mechanisms of brain plasticity by transcranial magnetic stimulation.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Modulation of motor cortical excitability by continuous theta-burst stimulation in adults with autism spectrum disorder.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Interindividual variability in response to continuous theta-burst stimulation in healthy adults.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2017
    Article
  15. Genetic Variation and Neuroplasticity: Role in Rehabilitation After Stroke.Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT · 2017
    Review
  16. Corticospinal excitability in the non-dominant hand is affected by BDNF genotype.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mina LeeDepartment of Neurology, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Song E Kim
Won Sup Kim
Jungyeun Lee
Hye Kyung Yoo
Kee-Duk Park
Kyoung-Gyu Choi
Seon-Yong Jeong
Byung Gon Kim
Hyang Woon Lee
Ewha Womans University · KRDongwha Pharm (South Korea) · KRAjou University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cortical physiology in human motor cortex is influenced by behavioral motor training (MT) as well as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol such as intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS). This study aimed to test whether MT and iTBS can interact with each other to produce additive changes in motor cortical physiology. We hypothesized that potential interaction between MT and iTBS would be dependent on BDNF Val66Met polymorphism, which is known to affect neuroplasticity in the human motor cortex. Eighty two healthy volunteers were genotyped for BDNF polymorphism. Thirty subjects were assigned for MT alone, 23 for iTBS alone, and 29 for MT + iTBS paradigms. TMS indices for cortical excitability and motor map areas were measured prior to and after each paradigm. MT alone significantly increased the motor cortical excitability and expanded the motor map areas. The iTBS alone paradigm also enhanced excitability and increased the motor map areas to a slightly greater extent than MT alone. A combination of MT and iTBS resulted in the largest increases in the cortical excitability, and the representational motor map expansion of MT + iTBS was significantly greater than MT or iTBS alone only in Val/Val genotype. As a result, the additive interaction between MT and iTBS was highly dependent on BDNF Val66Met polymorphism. Our results may have clinical relevance in designing rehabilitative strategies that combine therapeutic cortical stimulation and physical exercise for patients with motor disabilities.

Indexed as

AdultBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorDNAFemaleHumansMaleMotor CortexNeuronal PlasticityPolymorphism, Single NucleotideTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung AdultBDNF protein, humanBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorDNA

Identifiers

PMID23451258
PMCPMC3581515
OpenAlexW2058140054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.