SynthesisPloS one2013
Centre selection for clinical trials and the generalisability of results: a mixed methods study.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Economic Evaluation alongside Multinational Studies: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies.PloS one · 2015Pooled it
- An Approach to Assess Generalizability in Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Case Study of the Whole Systems Demonstrator Cluster Randomized Trial Comparing Telehealth with Usual Care for Patients with Chronic Health Conditions.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2015Trial
- Association Between Embodiment of a Muscular Avatar and Muscle Performance in Virtual Reality for Chronic Low Back Pain: Exploratory Pre-Post Study.JMIR serious games · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Complementary Nature of Randomized Controlled Trials and Real-World Evidence Using Over 5 Years of Experience with Fremanezumab: A Narrative Review.Advances in therapy · 2026Review
- Postoperative Pain Management Strategies Without Regional Analgesia in Knee Surgeries: A Scoping Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative Efficacy of Herbal Products for Improving Liver Enzymes and Inflammation in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Gastro hep advances · 2026Review
- Novel approaches to recruiting clinical sites for embedded pragmatic clinical trials: Insights from the AIM-back trial.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2025Article
- Going beyond randomised controlled trials to assess treatment effect heterogeneity across target populations.Health economics · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Assessing the representativeness of cluster randomized trials: Evidence from two large pragmatic trials in United States nursing homes.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2023Article
- Costs of fall injuries in the STRIDE study: an economic evaluation of healthcare system heterogeneity and heterogeneity of treatment effect.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2023Article
- Shifting research culture to address the mismatch between where trials recruit and where populations with the most disease live: a qualitative study.BMC medical research methodology · 2021Article
- Clinical trials with direct oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: how representative are they for real life patients?European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2016Article
- LEADER 7: cardiovascular risk profiles of US and European participants in the LEADER diabetes trial differ.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2016 · on this mapArticle
- Cluster Sampling Bias in Government-Sponsored Evaluations: A Correlational Study of Employment and Welfare Pilots in England.PloS one · 2016Article
- Evaluating the Generalisability of Trial Results: Introducing a Centre- and Trial-Level Generalisability Index.PharmacoEconomics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe rationale for centre selection in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is often unclear but may have important implications for the generalisability of trial results. The aims of this study were to evaluate the factors which currently influence centre selection in RCTs and consider how generalisability considerations inform current and optimal practice. METHODS AND
findingsMixed methods approach consisting of a systematic review and meta-summary of centre selection criteria reported in RCT protocols funded by the UK National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) initiated between January 2005-January 2012; and an online survey on the topic of current and optimal centre selection, distributed to professionals in the 48 UK Clinical Trials Units and 10 NIHR Research Design Services. The survey design was informed by the systematic review and by two focus groups conducted with trialists at the Birmingham Centre for Clinical Trials. 129 trial protocols were included in the systematic review, with a total target sample size in excess of 317,000 participants. The meta-summary identified 53 unique centre selection criteria. 78 protocols (60%) provided at least one criterion for centre selection, but only 31 (24%) protocols explicitly acknowledged generalisability. This is consistent with the survey findings (n = 70), where less than a third of participants reported generalisability as a key driver of centre selection in current practice. This contrasts with trialists' views on optimal practice, where generalisability in terms of clinical practice, population characteristics and economic results were prime considerations for 60% (n = 42), 57% (n = 40) and 46% (n = 32) of respondents, respectively.
conclusionsCentres are rarely enrolled in RCTs with an explicit view to external validity, although trialists acknowledge that incorporating generalisability in centre selection should ideally be more prominent. There is a need to operationalize 'generalisability' and incorporate it at the design stage of RCTs so that results are readily transferable to 'real world' practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.