Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23450876›Full record

ArticlePublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)

Missed connections: HIV-infected people never in care.

Jeanne Bertolli, Pamela Morse Garland, Eduardo E Valverde, Linda Beer, Jennifer L Fagan, Clyde Hart, Never in Care Pilot Project Team

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Informing Data to Care: Contacting Persons Sampled for the Medical Monitoring Project.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Factors associated with returning to HIV care after a gap in care in New York State.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2014
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jeanne BertolliCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA. JBertolli@cdc.gov
Pamela Morse Garland
Eduardo E Valverde
Linda Beer
Jennifer L Fagan
Clyde Hart
Never in Care Pilot Project Team

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveClinical interventions that lengthen life after HIV infection and significantly reduce transmission could have greater impact if more HIV-diagnosed people received HIV care. We tested a surveillance-based approach to investigating reasons for delayed entry to care.

methodsHealth department staff in three states and two cities contacted eligible adults diagnosed with HIV four to 24 months previously who had no reported CD4+ lymphocyte (CD4) or viral load (VL) tests. The staff conducted interviews, performed CD4 and VL testing, and provided referrals to HIV medical care. Reported CD4 and VL tests were prospectively monitored to determine if respondents had entered care after the interview.

resultsSurveillance-based follow-up uncovered problems with reporting CD4 and VL tests, resulting in surveillance improvements. However, reporting problems led to misspent effort locating people who were already in care. Follow-up proved difficult because contact information in surveillance case records was often outdated or incorrect. Of those reached, 37% were in care and 29% refused participation. Information from 132 people interviewed generated ideas for service improvements, such as emphasizing the benefits of early initiation of HIV care, providing coverage eligibility information soon after diagnosis, and leveraging other medical appointments to provide assistance with linkage to HIV care.

conclusionsSurveillance-based follow-up of HIV-diagnosed individuals not linked to care provided information to improve both surveillance and linkage services, but was inefficient because of difficulties identifying, locating, and recruiting eligible people. Inefficiencies attributable to missing, incomplete, or inaccurate surveillance records are likely to diminish as data quality is improved through ongoing use.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedDemographyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHIV InfectionsHumansIndianaMaleMiddle AgedNew JerseyNew York CityPatient Acceptance of Health CarePhiladelphiaPopulation Surveillance

Identifiers

PMID23450876
PMCPMC3560869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.