SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2013
Nurse versus physician-led care for the management of asthma.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Efficiency of Nurse-Led Interventions: Insights From a Critical Systematic Review.Nursing inquiry · 2026Pooled it
- General medical services by non-medical health professionals: a systematic quantitative review of economic evaluations in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019Pooled it
- Impact of non-drug therapies on asthma control: A systematic review of the literature.The European journal of general practice · 2019Pooled it
- Delivery arrangements for health systems in low-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Nurse-led versus doctor-led preoperative assessment for elective surgical patients requiring regional or general anaesthesia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Nurse versus physician-led care for the management of asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Nurse-led care for children with asthma in primary care: results of a randomised controlled trial.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Comparing Nurse-Led and Physician-Led Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure Management in Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Nursing open · 2025Article
- A global perspective of advanced practice nursing research: A review of systematic reviews.PloS one · 2024Review
- Identifying indicators sensitive to primary healthcare nurse practitioner practice: A review of systematic reviews.PloS one · 2023Review
- Revisiting the Time Needed to Provide Adult Primary Care.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Article
- Nurses and Pharmaceutical Care: Interprofessional, Evidence-Based Working to Improve Patient Care and Outcomes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Planned primary health care asthma contacts during 12-year follow-up after Finnish National Asthma Programme: focus on spirometry.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2020Article
- Protocolled practice nurse-led care for children with asthma in primary care: protocol for a cluster randomised trial.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Benefits of Advanced Practice Nursing for Its Expansion in the Spanish Context.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Review
- What Means A Quality Professional-Patient Relationship From The Asthmatic Patients' Perspective? A Narrative Review Of Their Needs And Expectations.Patient preference and adherence · 2019Review
- Engaging patients and primary care providers in the design of novel opinion leader based interventions for acute asthma in the emergency department: a mixed methods study.BMC health services research · 2018Article
- The Calgary COPD & Asthma Program: The role of the respiratory therapy profession in primary care.Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2018Article
- Behavior change interventions and policies influencing primary healthcare professionals' practice-an overview of reviews.Implementation science : IS · 2017Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAsthma is the most common chronic disease in childhood and prevalence is also high in adulthood, thereby placing a considerable burden on healthcare resources. Therefore, effective asthma management is important to reduce morbidity and to optimise utilisation of healthcare facilities.
objectivesTo review the effectiveness of nurse-led asthma care provided by a specialised asthma nurse, a nurse practitioner, a physician assistant or an otherwise specifically trained nursing professional, working relatively independently from a physician, compared to traditional care provided by a physician. Our scope included all outpatient care for asthma, both in primary care and in hospital settings. SEARCH
methodsWe carried out a comprehensive search of databases including The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify trials up to August 2012. Bibliographies of relevant papers were searched, and handsearching of relevant publications was undertaken to identify additional trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing nurse-led care versus physician-led care in asthma for the same aspect of asthma care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by The Cochrane Collaboration. MAIN
resultsFive studies on 588 adults and children were included concerning nurse-led care versus physician-led care. One study included 154 patients with uncontrolled asthma, while the other four studies including 434 patients with controlled or partly controlled asthma. The studies were of good methodological quality (although it is not possible to blind people giving or receiving the intervention to which group they are in). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of asthma exacerbations and asthma severity after treatment (duration of follow-up from six months to two years). Only one study had healthcare costs as an outcome parameter, no statistical differences were found. Although not a primary outcome, quality of life is a patient-important outcome and in the three trials on 380 subjects that reported on this outcome, there was no statistically significant difference (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.03; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.23 to 0.17). AUTHORS'
conclusionsWe found no significant difference between nurse-led care for patients with asthma compared to physician-led care for the outcomes assessed. Based on the relatively small number of studies in this review, nurse-led care may be appropriate in patients with well-controlled asthma. More studies in varied settings and among people with varying levels of asthma control are needed with data on adverse events and health-care costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.