Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23450599›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2013

Nurse versus physician-led care for the management of asthma.

Maarten C Kuethe, Anja A P H Vaessen-Verberne, Roy G Elbers, Wim M C Van Aalderen

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. General medical services by non-medical health professionals: a systematic quantitative review of economic evaluations in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Nurse versus physician-led care for the management of asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Revisiting the Time Needed to Provide Adult Primary Care.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Benefits of Advanced Practice Nursing for Its Expansion in the Spanish Context.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. The Calgary COPD & Asthma Program: The role of the respiratory therapy profession in primary care.Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2018
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maarten C KuethePaediatrics, AMPHIA Hospital, Breda, Netherlands. mkuethe@amphia.nl.
Anja A P H Vaessen-Verberne
Roy G Elbers
Wim M C Van Aalderen
Amphia Ziekenhuis · NLAcademic Medical Center · NLEmma Kinderziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAsthma is the most common chronic disease in childhood and prevalence is also high in adulthood, thereby placing a considerable burden on healthcare resources. Therefore, effective asthma management is important to reduce morbidity and to optimise utilisation of healthcare facilities.

objectivesTo review the effectiveness of nurse-led asthma care provided by a specialised asthma nurse, a nurse practitioner, a physician assistant or an otherwise specifically trained nursing professional, working relatively independently from a physician, compared to traditional care provided by a physician. Our scope included all outpatient care for asthma, both in primary care and in hospital settings. SEARCH

methodsWe carried out a comprehensive search of databases including The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify trials up to August 2012. Bibliographies of relevant papers were searched, and handsearching of relevant publications was undertaken to identify additional trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing nurse-led care versus physician-led care in asthma for the same aspect of asthma care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by The Cochrane Collaboration. MAIN

resultsFive studies on 588 adults and children were included concerning nurse-led care versus physician-led care. One study included 154 patients with uncontrolled asthma, while the other four studies including 434 patients with controlled or partly controlled asthma. The studies were of good methodological quality (although it is not possible to blind people giving or receiving the intervention to which group they are in). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of asthma exacerbations and asthma severity after treatment (duration of follow-up from six months to two years). Only one study had healthcare costs as an outcome parameter, no statistical differences were found. Although not a primary outcome, quality of life is a patient-important outcome and in the three trials on 380 subjects that reported on this outcome, there was no statistically significant difference (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.03; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.23 to 0.17). AUTHORS'

conclusionsWe found no significant difference between nurse-led care for patients with asthma compared to physician-led care for the outcomes assessed. Based on the relatively small number of studies in this review, nurse-led care may be appropriate in patients with well-controlled asthma. More studies in varied settings and among people with varying levels of asthma control are needed with data on adverse events and health-care costs.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementPractice Patterns, Nurses'Practice Patterns, Physicians'AdultAsthmaChildHumansQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID23450599
PMCPMC11810130
OpenAlexW1723006315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.