SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2013
Progestogens or progestogen-releasing intrauterine systems for uterine fibroids.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.
- The efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal medicine Guizhi Fuling capsule combined with low dose mifepristone in the treatment of uterine fibroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 28 randomized controlled trials.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2023Pooled it
- Interventions for heavy menstrual bleeding; overview of Cochrane reviews and network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Progestogens or progestogen-releasing intrauterine systems for uterine fibroids (other than preoperative medical therapy).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for endometrial hyperplasia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs) for uterine fibroids.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Effectiveness of a hysteroscopic tissue removal system device for hysteroscopic myomectomy on patients' quality of life: a randomized clinical trial.BMC women's health · 2023Trial
- Pharmacological treatment for uterine fibroids.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Early Vascular and Morphological Response After Transvaginal Radiofrequency Ablation of Uterine Fibroids: A Doppler-Based Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Contemporary Management of Uterine Fibroids.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Tailoring the Diagnostic Pathway for Medical and Surgical Treatment of Uterine Fibroids: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Uterine fibroids and longitudinal profiles of the vaginal microbiota in a cohort presenting for transvaginal ultrasound.PloS one · 2024Article
- Ulipristal acetate versus levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for heavy menstrual bleeding (UCON): a randomised controlled phase III trial.EClinicalMedicine · 2023Article
- Uterine Fibroids (Leiomyomata) and Heavy Menstrual Bleeding.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2022Review
- Uterine Fibroids and Progestogen Treatment: Lack of Evidence of Its Efficacy: A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate, weight gain and amenorrhea among obese adolescent and adult women.The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception · 2020Article
- Drug delivery for the treatment of endometriosis and uterine fibroids.Drug delivery and translational research · 2017Review
- The role of levonorgestrel intrauterine systems in the treatment of symptomatic fibroids.Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review · 2017Review
- Uterine fibroids - what's new?F1000Research · 2017Review
- Medical therapies for heavy menstrual bleeding in women with uterine fibroids: a retrospective analysis of a large commercially insured population in the USA.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2017Article
- Abnormal uterine bleeding.Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUterine fibroids are the most common premenopausal benign uterine tumours. Fibroids can cause symptoms including heavy menstrual bleeding, pelvic pressure and pain. Progestogens can be administered by various routes. Intramuscular injection of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) has dual actions (stimulatory or inhibitory) on fibroid cell growth. Progestogen-releasing intrauterine systems (IUS) decrease menstrual blood loss associated with fibroids by inducing endometrial atrophy and reduction of uterine fibroid size. Currently, their effectiveness for the treatment of uterine fibroids has not been evaluated.
objectivesTo determine the effectiveness of progestogens or progestogen-releasing intrauterine systems in treating premenopausal women with uterine fibroids. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Register (inception to 17 August 2012), CENTRAL (inception to 17 August 2012) and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (inception to 17 August 2012), Ovid EMBASE (1 January 2010 to 17 August 2012), Ovid PsycINFO (inception to 17 August 2012), CINAHL database, and trials registers for ongoing and registered trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: All identified published or unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of progestogens or progestogen-releasing intrauterine systems in treating premenopausal women with uterine fibroids. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We assessed all potentially eligible studies identified as a result of the search strategy. Two review authors extracted data from each included study using an agreed form and assessed the risk of bias. We resolved discrepancies through discussion. MAIN
resultsThis review included three studies. However, data for progestogen-releasing intrauterine systems were available from only one study that compared 29 women with a levonorgestrel (LNG)-IUS versus 29 women with a combined oral contraceptive (COC) for treating uterine fibroids. There was a significant reduction of menstrual blood loss (MBL) in women receiving the LNG-IUS compared to the COC using the alkaline hematin test (mean difference (MD) 77.5%, 95% CI 71.3% to 83.67%, 58 women) and a pictorial assessment chart (PBAC) (MD 34.5%, 95% CI 14.9% to 54.1%, 58 women). The reduction in uterine fibroid size was significantly greater in the leuprorelin group at 16 weeks compared to the progestogen lynestrenol group (MD -15.93 mm, 95% CI -18.02 to -13.84 mm, 46 women). There was no RCT evaluating the effect of DMPA on uterine fibroids. AUTHORS'
conclusionsProgestogen-releasing intrauterine systems appear to reduce menstrual blood loss in premenopausal women with uterine fibroids. Oral progestogens did not reduce fibroid size or fibroid- related symptoms. However, there was a methodological limitation and the one included study with data had a small sample size. This evidence is insufficient to support the use of progestogens or progestogen-releasing intrauterine systems in treating premenopausal women with uterine fibroids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.