Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23450588›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2013

Surgical cytoreduction for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.

Thuria Al Rawahi, Alberto D Lopes, Robert E Bristow, Andrew Bryant, Ahmed Elattar, Supratik Chattopadhyay, Khadra Galaal

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 70 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
24.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02317705 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

A Phase 2, Single Dose, Open-Label Study to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of OTL38 Injection (OTL38) for Intra-operative Imaging of Folate Receptor-alpha Positive Ovarian Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorOn Target Laboratories, LLCRan2014 to 2015Enrolled48ConditionsOvarian CancerArmsOTL38, Near infrared camera imaging system, Laparotomy
NCT05610501 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Ultrasound-guided Tru-Cut Biopsy in Pelvic Masses.

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenRan2021 to 2025Enrolled200ConditionsPelvic Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, Cervical Cancer, Uterus CancerArmsUltrasound guided tru-cut biopsy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 179 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Exenterative surgery for recurrent gynaecological malignancies.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Secondary Surgical Cytoreduction for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer.The New England journal of medicine · 2019
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Heterogeneity and treatment landscape of ovarian carcinoma.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
  20. Observational

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Thuria Al RawahiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Royal Hospital, Seeb, Oman.
Alberto D Lopes
Robert E Bristow
Andrew Bryant
Ahmed Elattar
Supratik Chattopadhyay
Khadra Galaal
Royal Cornwall Hospital · GBBirmingham City Hospital · GBNewcastle University · GBRoyal Hospital · OMSt James's University Hospital · GBUniversity of California, Irvine Medical Center · US

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe standard management of primary ovarian cancer is optimal cytoreductive surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy. Most women with primary ovarian cancer achieve remission on this combination therapy. For women achieving clinical remission after completion of initial treatment, most (60%) with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer will ultimately develop recurrent disease. However, the standard treatment of women with recurrent ovarian cancer remains poorly defined. Surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer has been suggested to be associated with increased overall survival.

objectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of optimal secondary cytoreductive surgery for women with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. To assess the impact of various residual tumour sizes, over a range between 0 cm and 2 cm, on overall survival. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) up to December 2012. We also searched registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings, reference lists of included studies and contacted experts in the field. For databases other than MEDLINE, the search strategy has been adapted accordingly. SELECTION CRITERIA: Retrospective data on residual disease, or data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or prospective/retrospective observational studies that included a multivariate analysis of 50 or more adult women with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer, who underwent secondary cytoreductive surgery with adjuvant chemotherapy. We only included studies that defined optimal cytoreduction as surgery leading to residual tumours with a maximum diameter of any threshold up to 2 cm. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors (KG, TA) independently abstracted data and assessed risk of bias. Where possible the data were synthesised in a meta-analysis. MAIN

resultsThere were no RCTs; however, we found nine non-randomised studies that reported on 1194 women with comparison of residual disease after secondary cytoreduction using a multivariate analysis that met our inclusion criteria. These retrospective and prospective studies assessed survival after secondary cytoreductive surgery in women with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.Meta- and single-study analyses show the prognostic importance of complete cytoreduction to microscopic disease, since overall survival was significantly prolonged in these groups of women (most studies showed a large statistically significant greater risk of death in all residual disease groups compared to microscopic disease).Recurrence-free survival was not reported in any of the studies. All of the studies included at least 50 women and used statistical adjustment for important prognostic factors. One study compared sub-optimal (> 1 cm) versus optimal (< 1 cm) cytoreduction and demonstrated benefit to achieving cytoreduction to less than 1 cm, if microscopic disease could not be achieved (hazard ratio (HR) 3.51, 95% CI 1.84 to 6.70). Similarly, one study found that women whose tumour had been cytoreduced to less than 0.5 cm had less risk of death compared to those with residual disease greater than 0.5 cm after surgery (HR not reported; P value < 0.001).There is high risk of bias due to the non-randomised nature of these studies, where, despite statistical adjustment for important prognostic factors, selection is based on retrospective achievability of cytoreduction, not an intention to treat, and so a degree of bias is inevitable.Adverse events, quality of life and cost-effectiveness were not reported in any of the studies. AUTHORS'

conclusionsIn women with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer, ability to achieve surgery with complete cytoreduction (no visible residual disease) is associated with significant improvement in overall survival. However, in the absence of RCT evidence, it is not clear whether this is solely due to surgical effect or due to tumour biology. Indirect evidence would support surgery to achieve complete cytoreduction in selected women. The risks of major surgery need to be carefully balanced against potential benefits on a case-by-case basis.

Indexed as

AdultAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm, ResidualNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialOvarian NeoplasmsTumor BurdenAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID23450588
PMCPMC6457850
OpenAlexW1901524790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.