Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23450583›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2013

Prophylactic gastrojejunostomy for unresectable periampullary carcinoma.

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Senthil Kumar, Brian R Davidson

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Palliative therapy in pancreatic cancer-palliative surgery.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Palliative Care for Pancreatic and Periampullary Cancer.The Surgical clinics of North America · 2016
    Review
  13. Review
  14. TTD consensus document on the diagnosis and management of exocrine pancreatic cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kurinchi Selvan GurusamyDepartment of Surgery, Royal Free Campus, UCLMedical School, London, UK. kurinchi2k@hotmail.com.
Senthil Kumar
Brian R Davidson

Funding

Department of Health 10/4001/11
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of prophylactic gastrojejunostomy in patients with unresectable periampullary cancer is controversial.

objectivesTo determine whether prophylactic gastrojejunostomy should be performed routinely in patients with unresectable periampullary cancer. SEARCH

methodsFor the initial version of this review, we searched the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases Group Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2010, issue 3), MEDLINE, EMBASE and Science Citation Index Expanded until April 2010. Literature searches were re-run in August 2012. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials comparing prophylactic gastrojejunostomy versus no gastrojejunostomy in patients with unresectable periampullary cancer (irrespective of language or publication status). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and independently extracted data. We analysed data with both the fixed-effect and the random-effects models using Review Manager (RevMan). We calculated the hazard ratio (HR), risk ratio (RR), and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) based on an intention-to-treat or available case analysis. MAIN

resultsWe identified two trials (of high risk of bias) involving 152 patients randomised to gastrojejunostomy (80 patients) and no gastrojejunostomy (72 patients). In both trials, patients were found to be unresectable during exploratory laparotomy. Most of the patients also underwent biliary-enteric drainage. There was no evidence of difference in the overall survival (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.84 to 1.25), peri-operative mortality or morbidity, quality of life, or hospital stay (MD 0.97 days; 95%CI -0.18 to 2.12) between the two groups. The proportion of patients who developed long-term gastric outlet obstruction was significantly lower in the prophylactic gastrojejunostomy group (2/80; 2.5%) compared with no gastrojejunostomy group (20/72; 27.8%) (RR 0.10; 95%CI 0.03 to 0.37). The operating time was significantly longer in the gastrojejunostomy group compared with no gastrojejunostomy group (MD 45.00 minutes; 95%CI 21.39 to 68.61). AUTHORS'

conclusionsRoutine prophylactic gastrojejunostomy is indicated in patients with unresectable periampullary cancer undergoing exploratory laparotomy (with or without hepaticojejunostomy).

Indexed as

Ampulla of VaterCommon Bile Duct NeoplasmsGastric BypassGastric Outlet ObstructionHumansJaundiceLength of StayQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID23450583
PMCPMC7173743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.