Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23450143›Full record

ArticleTremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.)2013

Key issues in essential tremor genetics research: Where are we now and how can we move forward?

Claudia M Testa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Essential tremor.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Genetic Testing Preferences of Individuals in Families with Essential Tremor.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Familial Aggregation of the Cerebellar Signs in Familial Essential Tremor.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2017
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Understanding essential tremor: progress on the biological front.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2014
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Claudia M TestaVirginia Commonwealth University, Parkinson's and Movement Disorders Center, Richmond Virginia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenetics research is an avenue towards understanding essential tremor (ET). Advances have been made in genetic linkage and association: there are three reported ET susceptibility loci, and mixed but growing data on risk associations. However, causal mutations have not been forthcoming. This disappointing lack of progress has opened productive discussions on challenges in ET and specifically ET genetics research, including fundamental assumptions in the field.

methodsThis article reviews the ET genetics literature, results to date, the open questions in ET genetics and the current challenges in addressing them.

resultsSEVERAL INHERENT ET FEATURES COMPLICATE GENETIC LINKAGE AND ASSOCIATION STUDIES: high potential phenocopy rates, inaccurate tremor self-reporting, and ET misdiagnoses are examples. Increasing use of direct examination data for subjects, family members, and controls is one current response. Smaller moves towards expanding ET phenotype research concepts into non-tremor features, clinically disputed ET subsets, and testing phenotype features instead of clinical diagnosis against genetic data are gradually occurring. The field has already moved to considering complex trait mechanisms requiring detection of combinations of rare genetic variants. Hypotheses may move further to consider novel mechanisms of inheritance, such as epigenetics. DISCUSSION: It is an exciting time in ET genetics as investigators start moving past assumptions underlying both phenotype and genetics experimental contributions, overcoming challenges to collaboration, and engaging the ET community. Multicenter collaborative efforts comprising rich longitudinal prospective phenotype data and neuropathologic analysis combined with the latest in genetics experimental design and technology will be the next wave in the field.

Indexed as

associationdystoniaEssential tremorgenelinkageparkinsonism

Identifiers

PMID23450143
PMCPMC3582856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.