ArticleIranian journal of nursing and midwifery research2011
Effects of walking on quality of life of mastectomy patients at selected hospitals of Tehran.
Article in Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychological consequences of mammography screening recommendations: a prospective cohort study in Iran.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Influence of Different Exercise Types on Health-Related Quality-of-Life in Men With Depressive Disorder in South Korea.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Effects of Different Types of Physical Activity on Health-Related Quality-of-Life in Korean Women with Depressive Disorder.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Breast cancer screening beliefs questionnaire: psychometric properties of the Persian version.BMC women's health · 2020Article
- Study on the Quality of Life Among the Cancer Patients at the Sari Comprehensive Cancer Center in 2017.Materia socio-medica · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer is the first-rank malignancy in women. Although surgery is the most common method of treatment, patients experience many threats both from the cancer and from the surgery itself. Exercises such as walking can improve body mass index, attitudes and life quality of patients. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of walking on physical aspect of quality of life (QOL) in mastectomy patients in 2007.
methodsThirty four mastectomy patients took part in the study. Walking was performed in a flat surface 3 times a week, each lasting 30 minutes over 6 weeks. Data were collected by a questionnaire before and after the intervention and a self-report form. After identifying content and face validity of the questionnaire, its reliability was measured by Cronbach's alpha (α = 0.89) and test-retest (r = 0.91) methods.
resultsMean scores (standard deviations) of physical, psychological, social, economic and religious aspects of QOL before the intervention were 64.55(8.10), 78.89 (5.81), 52.89 (10.74), 64.92 (8.64) and 64.76 (9.59), respectively. These aspects were 79.06 (25.62), 68.63 (16.29), 73.28 (15.32), 79.96 (12.57) and 82.54 (11.18) after the intervention, respectively. Total mean scores of QOL before the intervention was 66.16 (6.30) and increased to 75.74 (6.59) after the intervention with a significant difference in all aspects except the religious aspect. Therefore, this study showed the positive effects of walking on QOL of mastectomy patients.
conclusionsPatients with breast cancer experience physical as well as psychological malfunctions and fatigue during the condition and its treatment. Walking can solve many of their problems and, ultimately, improve their QOL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23450110PMC3583100What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.