Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23450065›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2013

Mature microsatellites: mechanisms underlying dinucleotide microsatellite mutational biases in human cells.

Beverly A Baptiste, Guruprasad Ananda, Noelle Strubczewski, Andrew Lutzkanin, Su Jen Khoo, Abhinaya Srikanth, Nari Kim, Kateryna D Makova, Maria M Krasilnikova, Kristin A Eckert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Revisiting mutagenesis at non-B DNA motifs in the human genome.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Remarkable selective constraints on exonic dinucleotide repeats.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Beverly A BaptisteIntercollege Graduate Program in Genetics, Huck Institutes of Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, USA.
Guruprasad Ananda
Noelle Strubczewski
Andrew Lutzkanin
Su Jen Khoo
Abhinaya Srikanth
Nari Kim
Kateryna D Makova
Maria M Krasilnikova
Kristin A Eckert
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Computational and Biochemical Analysis of Microsatellite Life CycleR01GM087472 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI ECKERT, KRISTIN A, MAKOVA, KATERYNA · 2009 to 2012
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087472NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM087472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dinucleotide microsatellites are dynamic DNA sequences that affect genome stability. Here, we focused on mature microsatellites, defined as pure repeats of lengths above the threshold and unlikely to mutate below it in a single mutational event. We investigated the prevalence and mutational behavior of these sequences by using human genome sequence data, human cells in culture, and purified DNA polymerases. Mature dinucleotides (≥10 units) are present within exonic sequences of >350 genes, resulting in vulnerability to cellular genetic integrity. Mature dinucleotide mutagenesis was examined experimentally using ex vivo and in vitro approaches. We observe an expansion bias for dinucleotide microsatellites up to 20 units in length in somatic human cells, in agreement with previous computational analyses of germ-line biases. Using purified DNA polymerases and human cell lines deficient for mismatch repair (MMR), we show that the expansion bias is caused by functional MMR and is not due to DNA polymerase error biases. Specifically, we observe that the MutSα and MutLα complexes protect against expansion mutations. Our data support a model wherein different MMR complexes shift the balance of mutations toward deletion or expansion. Finally, we show that replication fork progression is stalled within long dinucleotides, suggesting that mutational mechanisms within long repeats may be distinct from shorter lengths, depending on the biochemistry of fork resolution. Our work combines computational and experimental approaches to explain the complex mutational behavior of dinucleotide microsatellites in humans.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationGenome, HumanMicrosatellite RepeatsBase SequenceCell Line, TransformedDNA Mismatch RepairDNA Mutational AnalysisDNA Polymerase betaDNA Repair EnzymesGenetic VectorsGenomic InstabilityHCT116 CellsHumansMutagenesisMutation RateMutL ProteinsDNA Polymerase betaDNA Repair EnzymesMutLalpha protein, humanMutL Proteinsmicrosatellite instabilitymismatch repairshort tandem repeatsstrand slippage

Identifiers

PMID23450065
PMCPMC3583453
OpenAlexW2004102090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.