Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23449307›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2013

The role of tumour-stromal interactions in modifying drug response: challenges and opportunities.

Douglas W McMillin, Joseph M Negri, Constantine S Mitsiades

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 254 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
254citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
19.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

254 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 462 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Microbiota in cancer: current understandings and future perspectives.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

194 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Douglas W McMillinDepartment of Medical Oncology, DanaFarber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Joseph M Negri
Constantine S Mitsiades
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USHarvard University · US

Funding

PHS HHS R01‑50947
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of stromal cells and the tumour microenvironment in general in modulating tumour sensitivity is increasingly becoming a key consideration for the development of active anticancer therapeutics. Here, we discuss how these tumour-stromal interactions affect tumour cell signalling, survival, proliferation and drug sensitivity. Particular emphasis is placed on the ability of stromal cells to confer - to tumour cells - resistance or sensitization to different classes of therapeutics, depending on the specific microenvironmental context. The mechanistic understanding of these microenvironmental interactions can influence the evaluation and selection of candidate agents for various cancers, in both the primary site as well as the metastatic setting. Progress in in vitro screening platforms as well as orthotopic and 'orthometastatic' xenograft mouse models has enabled comprehensive characterization of the impact of the tumour microenvironment on therapeutic efficacy. These recent advances can hopefully bridge the gap between preclinical studies and clinical trials of anticancer agents.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsDrug DiscoveryDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalDrug Resistance, NeoplasmDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorHumansNeoplasmsPrecision MedicineStromal CellsAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID23449307
OpenAlexW1980669422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.