ArticleSeminars in interventional radiology2012
Acute deep vein thrombosis cases in the real world.
Article in Seminars in interventional radiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Long-term prognosis and related factors towards patients with acute pulmonary thromboembolism.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Practicing interventional radiologists (IRs) are routinely faced with challenging decisions that pertain to the management of patients with acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT). In this article, we describe five questions that are commonly posed by interventionalists and discuss both the indirect published evidence as well as our own experience in dealing with these issues. Our aim is to address procedural and, perhaps more importantly, nonprocedural-related knowledge domains with which the IR physician is less familiar and are often not directly addressed by published data or evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. This discussion is meant to facilitate a stronger understanding of the published literature as it pertains to the justifiable indications for endovascular thrombolytic therapy, the optimal use of anticoagulant therapy, and the reasonable use of adjuncts such as inferior vena cava filters and elastic compression stockings. Our goal is to provide a framework for practicing IRs to help them make the best clinical decisions for their individual patients and, ultimately, achieve optimal DVT treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.