Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23449010›Full record

ReviewJournal of endocrinological investigation2013

Oral contraceptives and cardiovascular risk in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.

E Carmina

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cardiovascular risk factors and events in women with androgen excess.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

E CarminaDISMOT Department, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy. carmina@unipa.it
University of Palermo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because women affected by polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) present an increased cardiovascular risk, the safety of estroprogestin treatment is debated and contrasting data have been reported. However, cardiovascular risk is not the same in all PCOS women and individual cardiovascular risk should be assessed before staring any estroprogestin treatment. The available data show that products containing both 2nd-generation and 3rd-generation progestins (including drospirenone and cyproterone acetate) represent a safe treatment in PCOS patients with regular cardiovascular risk. In PCOS patients with increased cardiovascular risk, a careful choice of estroprogestin product is needed and cardiovascular risk should be monitored during treatment. In obese PCOS patients with normal glucose tolerance and lipid profile, products containing 2nd-generation progestins may be preferred because of lower venous thromboembolism risk. In PCOS patients with altered lipid profile or glucose intolerance, 3rd-generation progestins should be used but, during treatment, cardiovascular risk should be periodically re-assessed. In special situations, metformin or statins may be added to estroprogestin treatment.

Indexed as

AdultCardiovascular DiseasesContraceptives, Oral, CombinedContraceptives, Oral, HormonalFemaleHumansPolycystic Ovary SyndromePrecision MedicineRiskContraceptives, Oral, CombinedContraceptives, Oral, Hormonal

Identifiers

PMID23449010
OpenAlexW66873762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.