Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23448408›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2013

Trace gluten contamination may play a role in mucosal and clinical recovery in a subgroup of diet-adherent non-responsive celiac disease patients.

Justin R Hollon, Pamela A Cureton, Margaret L Martin, Elaine L Leonard Puppa, Alessio Fasano

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06500754 (Study of the Causes and Consequences of Persistent Villous Atrophy Despite an Intentionally Strict Gluten-free Diet in Celiac Disease Patients - Effect of an Ultra-strict Gluten-free Diet on Persistent Villous Atrophy), which is not on this map. Cited by 53 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06500754 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Study of the Causes and Consequences of Persistent Villous Atrophy Despite an Intentionally Strict Gluten-free Diet in Celiac Disease Patients - Effect of an Ultra-strict Gluten-free Diet on Persistent Villous Atrophy

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital Mutua de TerrassaRan2022 to 2027Enrolled80ConditionsCeliac Disease, Villous Atrophy of IntestineArmsUltra-strict gluten-free diet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Beyond gluten-free diet: Novel therapeutic frontiers in celiac disease armamentarium.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Refractory Celiac Disease: What the Gastroenterologist Should Know.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Evolution in coeliac disease diagnosis and management.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. New Developments in Celiac Disease Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Celiac Disease in the Elderly.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Justin R HollonDivision of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Brady 320, Baltimore, MD, USA. jhollon1@jhmi.edu
Pamela A Cureton
Margaret L Martin
Elaine L Leonard Puppa
Alessio Fasano
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USHarvard University · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with persistent symptoms and/or villous atrophy despite strict adherence to a gluten-free diet (GFD) have non-responsive celiac disease (NRCD). A subset of these patients has refractory celiac disease (RCD), yet some NRCD patients may simply be reacting to gluten cross-contamination. Here we describe the effects of a 3-6 month diet of whole, unprocessed foods, termed the Gluten Contamination Elimination Diet (GCED), on NRCD. We aim to demonstrate that this diet reclassifies the majority of patients thought to have RCD type 1 (RCD1).

methodsWe reviewed the records of all GFD-adherent NRCD patients cared for in our celiac center from 2005-2011 who were documented to have started the GCED. Response to the GCED was defined as being asymptomatic after the diet, with normal villous architecture on repeat biopsy, if performed.

resultsPrior to the GCED, all patients were interviewed by an experienced dietitian and no sources of hidden gluten ingestion were identified. 17 patients completed the GCED; 15 were female (88%). Median age at start of the GCED was 42 years (range 6-73). Fourteen patients (82%) responded to the GCED. Six patients met criteria for RCD prior to the GCED; 5 (83%) were asymptomatic after the GCED and no longer meet RCD criteria. Of the 14 patients who responded to the GCED, 11 (79%) successfully returned to a traditional GFD without resurgence of symptoms.

conclusionsThe GCED may be an effective therapeutic option for GFD-adherent NRCD patients. Response to this diet identifies a subgroup of patients, previously classified as RCD1, that is not truly refractory to dietary treatment. Preventing an inaccurate diagnosis of RCD1 avoids immunotherapy. Most patients are able to return to a traditional GFD without return of symptoms.

Indexed as

Diet, Gluten-FreeFood ContaminationPatient ComplianceAdolescentAdultAgedAtrophyBiopsyCeliac DiseaseChildFemaleGlutensHumansIntestinal MucosaIntestine, SmallMaleGlutens

Identifiers

PMID23448408
PMCPMC3598839
OpenAlexW2105394907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.