ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2013
Cellular differentiation and individuality in the 'minor' multicellular taxa.
Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.
- Experimental snowball earth viscosity drives the evolution of motile multicellularity.iScience · 2026Article
- A universal spikey silica nanoparticle-mediated siRNA delivery for red seaweeds and land plants reveals PyKNOX 's role during haploid-diploid transition in Pyropia yezoensis.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Navigating the Semantic Labyrinth of "Sex" in the Study of Reproductive Trait Evolution.Integrative and comparative biology · 2026Article
- Priority effects inhibit the repeated evolution of phototrophy.Npj complexity · 2026Article
- Adaptive evolutionary trajectories in complexity: Transitions between unicellularity and facultative differentiated multicellularity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- The Elephant and the Spandrel.Evolution, medicine, and public health · 2025Article
- Genomic sequencing reveals convergent adaptation during experimental evolution in two budding yeast species.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Fossil-calibrated molecular clock data enable reconstruction of steps leading to differentiated multicellularity and anisogamy in the Volvocine algae.BMC biology · 2024Article
- Conflict-reducing innovations in development enable increased multicellular complexity.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- A novel open-source cultivation system helps establish the first full cycle chemosynthetic symbiosis model system involving the giant ciliateFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Ancient reproductive modes and criteria of multicellularity.Comparative cytogenetics · 2023Review
- Multicellularity in animals: The potential for within-organism conflict.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Diverse and complex developmental mechanisms of early Ediacaran embryo-like fossils from the Weng'an Biota, southwest China.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Role of epigenetics in unicellular to multicellular transition in Dictyostelium.Genome biology · 2021Article
- Rampant loss of social traits during domestication of a Bacillus subtilis natural isolate.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Emergence of diverse life cycles and life histories at the origin of multicellularity.Nature ecology & evolution · 2019Article
- Evolutionary maintenance of genomic diversity within arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.Ecology and evolution · 2019Article
- De novo origins of multicellularity in response to predation.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Understanding Multicellularity: The Functional Organization of the Intercellular Space.Frontiers in physiology · 2019Article
- Trait heritability in major transitions.BMC biology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Biology needs a concept of individuality in order to distinguish organisms from parts of organisms and from groups of organisms, to count individuals and compare traits across taxa, and to distinguish growth from reproduction. Most of the proposed criteria for individuality were designed for 'unitary' or 'paradigm' organisms: contiguous, functionally and physiologically integrated, obligately sexually reproducing multicellular organisms with a germ line sequestered early in development. However, the vast majority of the diversity of life on Earth does not conform to all of these criteria. We consider the issue of individuality in the 'minor' multicellular taxa, which collectively span a large portion of the eukaryotic tree of life, reviewing their general features and focusing on a model species for each group. When the criteria designed for unitary organisms are applied to other groups, they often give conflicting answers or no answer at all to the question of whether or not a given unit is an individual. Complex life cycles, intimate bacterial symbioses, aggregative development, and strange genetic features complicate the picture. The great age of some of the groups considered shows that 'intermediate' forms, those with some but not all of the traits traditionally associated with individuality, cannot reasonably be considered ephemeral or assumed transitional. We discuss a handful of recent attempts to reconcile the many proposed criteria for individuality and to provide criteria that can be applied across all the domains of life. Finally, we argue that individuality should be defined without reference to any particular taxon and that understanding the emergence of new kinds of individuals requires recognizing individuality as a matter of degree.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.