Trial reportBMC cancer2013
Using a state cancer registry to recruit young breast cancer survivors and high-risk relatives: protocol of a randomized trial testing the efficacy of a targeted versus a tailored intervention to increase breast cancer screening.
Trial report in BMC cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01612338 (Interventions to Increase Screening Utilization by Breast Cancer Survivors and Their High Risk Female Relatives), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Interventions to Increase Screening Utilization by Breast Cancer Survivors and Their High Risk Female Relatives: Using Cancer Surveillance and the Michigan Genomics Academic-Practice Partnership
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Registry-based randomised controlled trials: conduct, advantages and challenges-a systematic review.Trials · 2024Pooled it
- A Model-Based Meta-Analysis of Willingness to Participate in Cancer Screening.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Predictors and Interdependence of Quality of Life in a Random Sample of Long-Term Young Breast Cancer Survivors and Their Biological Relatives.Cancer medicine · 2024Trial
- Disparities in genetic services utilization in a random sample of young breast cancer survivors.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019Trial
- Article
- Dental Research in the Digital Age: The Registry-Based Clinical Trial.Clinical oral implants research · 2026Article
- Article
- Accuracy of Perceived Breast Cancer Risk in Black and White Women with an Elevated Risk.Ethnicity & disease · 2022Article
- Article
- Cancer surveillance and preventive services in a diverse sample of breast and colorectal cancer survivors.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2021Article
- Genetic Testing and Surveillance of Young Breast Cancer Survivors and Blood Relatives: A Cluster Randomized Trial.Cancers · 2020Article
- Effectiveness and Cost of Recruiting Participants to a Research Registry Using an Emergency Department Research Associate Program.Clinical and translational science · 2020Article
- Machine learning techniques for personalized breast cancer risk prediction: comparison with the BCRAT and BOADICEA models.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2019Article
- Predictors and interdependence of family support in a random sample of long-term young breast cancer survivors and their biological relatives.Cancer medicine · 2018Article
- Article
- Development of a Web-based Family Intervention for BRCA Carriers and Their Biological Relatives: Acceptability, Feasibility, and Usability Study.JMIR cancer · 2018Article
- Cancer Predisposition Cascade Screening for Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer and Lynch Syndromes in Switzerland: Study Protocol.JMIR research protocols · 2017Article
- Expert and Advocacy Group Consensus Findings on the Horizon of Public Health Genetic Testing.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Article
- Obesity, physical activity, and dietary behaviors in an ethnically-diverse sample of cancer survivors with early onset disease.Journal of psychosocial oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Michigan Prevention Research Center, the University of Michigan Schools of Nursing, Public Health, and Medicine, and the Michigan Department of Community Health propose a multidisciplinary academic-clinical practice three-year project to increase breast cancer screening among young breast cancer survivors and their cancer-free female relatives at greatest risk for breast cancer. METHODS/
designThe study has three specific aims: 1) Identify and survey 3,000 young breast cancer survivors (diagnosed at 20-45 years old) regarding their breast cancer screening utilization. 2) Identify and survey survivors' high-risk relatives regarding their breast cancer screening utilization. 3) Test two versions (Targeted vs. Enhanced Tailored) of an intervention to increase breast cancer screening among survivors and relatives. Following approval by human subjects review boards, 3,000 young breast cancer survivors will be identified through the Michigan Cancer Registry and mailed an invitation letter and a baseline survey. The baseline survey will obtain information on the survivors': a) current breast cancer screening status and use of genetic counseling; b) perceived barriers and facilitators to screening; c) family health history. Based on the family history information provided by survivors, we will identify up to two high-risk relatives per survivor. Young breast cancer survivors will be mailed consent forms and baseline surveys to distribute to their selected high-risk relatives. Relatives' baseline survey will obtain information on their: a) current breast cancer screening status and use of genetic counseling; and b) perceived barriers and facilitators to screening. Young breast cancer survivors and high-risk relatives will be randomized as a family unit to receive two versions of an intervention aiming to increase breast cancer screening and use of cancer genetic services. A follow-up survey will be mailed 9 months after the intervention to survivors and high-risk relatives to evaluate the efficacy of each intervention version on: a) use of breast cancer screening and genetic counseling; b) perceived barriers and facilitators to screening; c) self-efficacy in utilizing cancer genetic and screening services; d) family support related to screening; e) knowledge of breast cancer genetics; and f) satisfaction with the intervention. DISCUSSION: The study will enhance efforts of the state of Michigan surrounding cancer prevention, control, and public health genomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.