Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23448100›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2013

Using a state cancer registry to recruit young breast cancer survivors and high-risk relatives: protocol of a randomized trial testing the efficacy of a targeted versus a tailored intervention to increase breast cancer screening.

Maria C Katapodi, Laurel L Northouse, Ann M Schafenacker, Debra Duquette, Sonia A Duffy, David L Ronis, Beth Anderson, Nancy K Janz, Jennifer McLosky, Kara J Milliron and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01612338 (Interventions to Increase Screening Utilization by Breast Cancer Survivors and Their High Risk Female Relatives), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01612338 nacompletednot on this map

Interventions to Increase Screening Utilization by Breast Cancer Survivors and Their High Risk Female Relatives: Using Cancer Surveillance and the Michigan Genomics Academic-Practice Partnership

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MichiganRan2012 to 2014Enrolled1,290ConditionsBreast Cancer, Breast Cancer in Young Women, Breast Cancer in Women With a Strong Family HistoryArmsTargeted, Enhanced Tailored
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Model-Based Meta-Analysis of Willingness to Participate in Cancer Screening.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Disparities in genetic services utilization in a random sample of young breast cancer survivors.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Maria C KatapodiUniversity of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 N, Ingalls Building, Room 2158, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. mkatapo@umich.edu
Laurel L Northouse
Ann M Schafenacker
Debra Duquette
Sonia A Duffy
David L Ronis
Beth Anderson
Nancy K Janz
Jennifer McLosky
Kara J Milliron
Sofia D Merajver
Linh M Duong
Glenn Copeland
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USMichigan Department of Health and Human Services · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USMichigan Center for Translational Pathology · US

Funding

PREVENTION RESEARCH CENTER OF MICHIGANU48DP001901 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ZIMMERMAN, MARC A · 2009 to 2013
$5.9M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS 5 U48 DP001901-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Michigan Prevention Research Center, the University of Michigan Schools of Nursing, Public Health, and Medicine, and the Michigan Department of Community Health propose a multidisciplinary academic-clinical practice three-year project to increase breast cancer screening among young breast cancer survivors and their cancer-free female relatives at greatest risk for breast cancer. METHODS/

designThe study has three specific aims: 1) Identify and survey 3,000 young breast cancer survivors (diagnosed at 20-45 years old) regarding their breast cancer screening utilization. 2) Identify and survey survivors' high-risk relatives regarding their breast cancer screening utilization. 3) Test two versions (Targeted vs. Enhanced Tailored) of an intervention to increase breast cancer screening among survivors and relatives. Following approval by human subjects review boards, 3,000 young breast cancer survivors will be identified through the Michigan Cancer Registry and mailed an invitation letter and a baseline survey. The baseline survey will obtain information on the survivors': a) current breast cancer screening status and use of genetic counseling; b) perceived barriers and facilitators to screening; c) family health history. Based on the family history information provided by survivors, we will identify up to two high-risk relatives per survivor. Young breast cancer survivors will be mailed consent forms and baseline surveys to distribute to their selected high-risk relatives. Relatives' baseline survey will obtain information on their: a) current breast cancer screening status and use of genetic counseling; and b) perceived barriers and facilitators to screening. Young breast cancer survivors and high-risk relatives will be randomized as a family unit to receive two versions of an intervention aiming to increase breast cancer screening and use of cancer genetic services. A follow-up survey will be mailed 9 months after the intervention to survivors and high-risk relatives to evaluate the efficacy of each intervention version on: a) use of breast cancer screening and genetic counseling; b) perceived barriers and facilitators to screening; c) self-efficacy in utilizing cancer genetic and screening services; d) family support related to screening; e) knowledge of breast cancer genetics; and f) satisfaction with the intervention. DISCUSSION: The study will enhance efforts of the state of Michigan surrounding cancer prevention, control, and public health genomics.

Indexed as

Family RelationsPatient SelectionRegistriesSurvivorsAdultBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHealth BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMass ScreeningMichiganMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23448100
PMCPMC3599993
OpenAlexW2029379772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.