Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23447708›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology of the cell2013

Mapping and analysis of phosphorylation sites: a quick guide for cell biologists.

Noah Dephoure, Kathleen L Gould, Steven P Gygi, Douglas R Kellogg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology of the cell, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 144 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
144citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

144 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Identification of IDUA and WNT16 Phosphorylation-Related Non-Synonymous Polymorphisms for Bone Mineral Density in Meta-Analyses of Genome-Wide Association Studies.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Phosphorylation of Bok at Ser-8 blocks its ability to suppress IPCell communication and signaling : CCS · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. CLK2 Condensates Reorganize Nuclear Speckles and Induce Intron Retention.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

84 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Noah DephoureDepartment of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115-5701, USA.
Kathleen L Gould
Steven P Gygi
Douglas R Kellogg

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A mechanistic understanding of signaling networks requires identification and analysis of phosphorylation sites. Mass spectrometry offers a rapid and highly sensitive approach to mapping phosphorylation sites. However, mass spectrometry has significant limitations that must be considered when planning to carry out phosphorylation-site mapping. Here we provide an overview of key information that should be taken into consideration before beginning phosphorylation-site analysis, as well as a step-by-step guide for carrying out successful experiments.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsAmino Acid SequenceChromosome MappingDatabases, ProteinPeptide FragmentsPhosphoproteinsPhosphorylationSignal TransductionTandem Mass SpectrometryAmino AcidsPeptide FragmentsPhosphoproteins

Identifiers

PMID23447708
PMCPMC3583658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.