Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23447618›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2013

Basolateral amygdala lesions facilitate reward choices after negative feedback in rats.

Alicia Izquierdo, Chelsi Darling, Nic Manos, Hilda Pozos, Charissa Kim, Serena Ostrander, Victor Cazares, Haley Stepp, Peter H Rudebeck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Noninvasive Suppression of Responses to Threat Using Focused Ultrasonic Waves.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Dissociable Contributions of Basolateral Amygdala and Ventrolateral Orbitofrontal Cortex to Flexible Learning Under Uncertainty.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Foraging with the frontal cortex: A cross-species evaluation of reward-guided behavior.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alicia IzquierdoLaboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, California State University, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90032, USA. aizquie@calstatela.edu
Chelsi Darling
Nic Manos
Hilda Pozos
Charissa Kim
Serena Ostrander
Victor Cazares
Haley Stepp
Peter H Rudebeck

Funding

Methamphetamine effect on cognitive flexibilitySC2MH087974 · NIMH · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LOS ANGELES · PI IZQUIERDO, ALICIA · 2009 to 2011
$432k
NIMH NIH HHS SC2 MH087974NIMH NIH HHS SC2MH087974-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and basolateral amygdala (BLA) constitute part of a neural circuit important for adaptive, goal-directed learning. One task measuring flexibility of response to changes in reward is discrimination reversal learning. Damage to OFC produces well documented impairments on various forms of reversal learning in rodents, monkeys, and humans. Recent reports show that BLA, though highly interconnected with OFC, may be differentially involved in reversal learning. In the present experiment, we compared the effects of bilateral, ibotenic acid lesions of OFC or BLA (or SHAM) on visual discrimination and reversal learning. Specifically, we used pairwise visual discrimination methods, as is commonly administered in non-human primate studies, and analyzed how animals use positive and negative trial-by-trial feedback, domains not previously explored in a rat study. As expected, OFC lesions displayed significantly slower reversal learning than SHAM and BLA rats across sessions. Rats with BLA lesions, conversely, showed facilitated reversal learning relative to SHAM and OFC groups. Furthermore, a trial-by-trial analysis of the errors committed showed the BLA group benefited more from incorrectly performed trials (or negative feedback) on future choices than either SHAM or OFC rats. This provides evidence that BLA and OFC are involved in updating responses to changes in reward contingency and that the roles are distinct. Our results are discussed in relation to a competitive framework model for OFC and BLA in reward processing.

Indexed as

FeedbackRewardAmygdalaAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsChoice BehaviorConditioning, OperantDiscrimination LearningExcitatory Amino Acid AgonistsFood PreferencesIbotenic AcidMalePhotic StimulationPrefrontal CortexRatsRats, Long-EvansExcitatory Amino Acid AgonistsIbotenic Acid

Identifiers

PMID23447618
PMCPMC3606920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.