Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23447591›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2013

Latent modulation: a basis for non-disruptive promotion of two incompatible behaviors by a single network state.

Andrew M Dacks, Klaudiusz R Weiss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Variable task switching in the feeding network ofJournal of neurophysiology · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. An Anticipatory Circuit Modification That Modifies Subsequent Task Switching.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Network Degeneracy and the Dynamics of Task Switching in the Feeding Circuit inThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cellular Effects of Repetition Priming in theThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Use of theJournal of neurophysiology · 2017
    Review
  15. Memory of recent oxygen experience switches pheromone valence inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  16. Consequences of degeneracy in network function.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2016
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Sensory Cortical Activity Is Related to the Selection of a Rhythmic Motor Action Pattern.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Specificity of repetition priming: the role of chemical coding.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrew M DacksDepartment of Neuroscience, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029, USA. adacks@gmail.com
Klaudiusz R Weiss

Funding

Neural Basis of Behavioral ArousalR01NS066587 · NINDS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI CROPPER, ELIZABETH C · 2009 to 2023
$5.2M
Neural Basis of Behavioral FlexibilityR01NS070583 · NINDS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI CROPPER, ELIZABETH C, WEISS, KLAUDIUSZ ROBERT · 2010 to 2020
$3.6M
NINDS NIH HHS NS066587NINDS NIH HHS NS070583NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS066587NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS070583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavioral states often preferentially enhance specific classes of behavior and suppress incompatible behaviors. In the nervous system, this may involve upregulation of the efficacy of neural modules that mediate responses to one stimulus and suppression of modules that generate antagonistic or incompatible responses to another stimulus. In Aplysia, prestimulation of egestive inputs [esophageal nerve (EN)] facilitates subsequent EN-elicited egestive responses and weakens ingestive responses to ingestive inputs [Cerebral-Buccal Interneuron (CBI-2)]. However, a single state can also promote incompatible behaviors in response to different stimuli. This is the case in Aplysia, where prestimulation of CBI-2 inputs not only enhances subsequent CBI-2-elicited ingestive responses, but also strengthens EN-elicited egestive responses. We used the modularly organized feeding network of Aplysia to characterize the organizational principles that allow a single network state to promote two opposing behaviors, ingestion and egestion, without the two interfering with each other. We found that the CBI-2 prestimulation-induced state upregulates the excitability of neuron B65 which, as a member of the egestive module, increases the strength of egestive responses. Furthermore, we found that this upregulation is likely mediated by the actions of the neuropeptides FCAP (Feeding Circuit Activating Peptide) and CP2 (Cerebral Peptide 2). This increased excitability is mediated by a form of modulation that we refer to as "latent modulation" because it is established during stimulation of CBI-2, which does not activate B65. However, when B65 is recruited into EN-elicited egestive responses, the effects of the latent modulation are expressed as a higher B65 firing rate and a resultant strengthening of the egestive response.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsAplysiaBiophysicsElectric StimulationFeeding BehaviorInhibitory Postsynaptic PotentialsMotor ActivityNerve NetNeural PathwaysNeuronsNeuropeptidesNeuropeptides

Identifiers

PMID23447591
PMCPMC3665354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.