SynthesisThe American journal of clinical nutrition2013
Eating attentively: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of food intake memory and awareness on eating.
Synthesis in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 90 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Enhancing Memory to Facilitate Weight Loss: Tracking, Recording and Coaching
An Open Label Pilot Study of Tracking and Behavior Change for Weight Loss in Adults
Who cites it
90 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Eating while distracted: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of distraction on concurrent and later energy intake in adults.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Meaningfully reducing consumption of meat and animal products is an unsolved problem: A meta-analysis.Appetite · 2026Pooled it
- Watching Television While Eating Increases Food Intake: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Experimental Studies.Nutrients · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Downsizing food: a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the effect of reducing served food portion sizes on daily energy intake and body weight.The British journal of nutrition · 2023Pooled it
- The influence of experimental confederate peers on children's food intake: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Appetite · 2022Pooled it
- The Relationship between Music and Food Intake: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Nutrients · 2021Pooled it
- Ultra-processed food and the risk of overweight and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2020Pooled it
- Trial
- Comparison of Self-Reported Speed of Eating with an Objective Measure of Eating Rate.Nutrients · 2020Trial
- Child and adult snack food intake in response to manipulated pre-packaged snack item quantity/variety and snack box size: a population-based randomized trial.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2019Trial
- Eating Occasions, Obesity and Related Behaviors in Working Adults: Does it Matter When You Snack?Nutrients · 2019Trial
- A smartphone based attentive eating intervention for energy intake and weight loss: results from a randomised controlled trial.BMC public health · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Mindless feeding: Is maternal distraction during bottle-feeding associated with overfeeding?Appetite · 2015Trial
- Are You Sure? Confidence about the Satiating Capacity of a Food Affects Subsequent Food Intake.Nutrients · 2015Trial
- Association between Mindfulness and Weight Status in a General Population from the NutriNet-Santé Study.PloS one · 2015Trial
- Watching TV and food intake: the role of content.PloS one · 2014Trial
- Article
- Development and Validation of the Food Consumption Rate Questionnaire (FCRQ): A Behaviorally Informed Measure of Eating-Rate Regulation.Nutrients · 2026Article
30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCognitive processes such as attention and memory may influence food intake, but the degree to which they do is unclear.
objectiveThe objective was to examine whether such cognitive processes influence the amount of food eaten either immediately or in subsequent meals.
designWe systematically reviewed studies that examined experimentally the effect that manipulating memory, distraction, awareness, or attention has on food intake. We combined studies by using inverse variance meta-analysis, calculating the standardized mean difference (SMD) in food intake between experimental and control groups and assessing heterogeneity with the I(2) statistic.
resultsTwenty-four studies were reviewed. Evidence indicated that eating when distracted produced a moderate increase in immediate intake (SMD: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.53) but increased later intake to a greater extent (SMD: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.45, 1.07). The effect of distraction on immediate intake appeared to be independent of dietary restraint. Enhancing memory of food consumed reduced later intake (SMD: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.12, 0.68), but this effect may depend on the degree of the participants' tendencies toward disinhibited eating. Removing visual information about the amount of food eaten during a meal increased immediate intake (SMD: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.27, 0.68). Enhancing awareness of food being eaten may not affect immediate intake (SMD: 0.09; 95% CI: -0.42, 0.35).
conclusionsEvidence indicates that attentive eating is likely to influence food intake, and incorporation of attentive-eating principles into interventions provides a novel approach to aid weight loss and maintenance without the need for conscious calorie counting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.