Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23446832›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2013

Enrichment of specific protozoan populations during in situ bioremediation of uranium-contaminated groundwater.

Dawn E Holmes, Ludovic Giloteaux, Kenneth H Williams, Kelly C Wrighton, Michael J Wilkins, Courtney A Thompson, Thomas J Roper, Philip E Long, Derek R Lovley

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Dawn E HolmesDepartment of Microbiology, Morrill Science Center IVN, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA. dholmes@microbio.umass.edu
Ludovic Giloteaux
Kenneth H Williams
Kelly C Wrighton
Michael J Wilkins
Courtney A Thompson
Thomas J Roper
Philip E Long
Derek R Lovley
University of Massachusetts Amherst · USLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USWestern New England University · USPacific Northwest National Laboratory · USPlanetary Science Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of bacteria in the anaerobic bioremediation of groundwater polluted with organic and/or metal contaminants is well recognized and in some instances so well understood that modeling of the in situ metabolic activity of the relevant subsurface microorganisms in response to changes in subsurface geochemistry is feasible. However, a potentially significant factor influencing bacterial growth and activity in the subsurface that has not been adequately addressed is protozoan predation of the microorganisms responsible for bioremediation. In field experiments at a uranium-contaminated aquifer located in Rifle, CO, USA, acetate amendments initially promoted the growth of metal-reducing Geobacter species, followed by the growth of sulfate reducers, as observed previously. Analysis of 18S rRNA gene sequences revealed a broad diversity of sequences closely related to known bacteriovorous protozoa in the groundwater before the addition of acetate. The bloom of Geobacter species was accompanied by a specific enrichment of sequences most closely related to the ameboid flagellate, Breviata anathema, which at their peak accounted for over 80% of the sequences recovered. The abundance of Geobacter species declined following the rapid emergence of B. anathema. The subsequent growth of sulfate-reducing Peptococcaceae was accompanied by another specific enrichment of protozoa, but with sequences most similar to diplomonadid flagellates from the family Hexamitidae, which accounted for up to 100% of the sequences recovered during this phase of the bioremediation. These results suggest a prey-predator response with specific protozoa responding to increased availability of preferred prey bacteria. Thus, quantifying the influence of protozoan predation on the growth, activity and composition of the subsurface bacterial community is essential for predictive modeling of in situ uranium bioremediation strategies.

Indexed as

AcetatesBiodegradation, EnvironmentalEukaryotaGeobacterGroundwaterMolecular Sequence DataOxidation-ReductionPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 18SUraniumAcetatesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 18SUranium

Identifiers

PMID23446832
PMCPMC3695288
OpenAlexW2053745670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.