Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23446811›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2013

The protective effect of intermittent calorie restriction on mammary tumorigenesis is not compromised by consumption of a high fat diet during refeeding.

Olga P Rogozina, Katai J Nkhata, Emily J Nagle, Joseph P Grande, Margot P Cleary

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Olga P RogozinaThe Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, 801 16th Avenue NE, Austin, MN 55912, USA.
Katai J Nkhata
Emily J Nagle
Joseph P Grande
Margot P Cleary
Hormel (United States) · USUniversity of Minnesota · USMayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

Prevention of mammary tumors by metformin in comparison to calorie restrictionR01CA157012 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CLEARY, MARGOT P · 2011 to 2015
$1.6M
Intermittent food restriction prevents mammary tumorsR01CA101858 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI CLEARY, MARGOT P · 2004 to 2008
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS CA 101858NCI NIH HHS R01 CA101858NCI NIH HHS R01 CA157012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previously we reported that intermittent calorie restriction (ICR) provided greater prevention of mammary tumors (MTs) than chronic calorie restriction (CCR). Here the impact of increased fat intake during refeeding in an ICR protocol was evaluated. MMTV-TGF-α female mice were assigned to one of three groups: ad libitum (AL) fed (n = 45) with free access to a moderately high fat diet (22 % fat calories); ICR (n = 45) 50 % calorie restricted for 3-week intervals followed by 3 weeks of 100 % of AL intake; and CCR (n = 45) fed 75 % of AL mice, matching each 6-week cycle of ICR mice. ICR mice were further designated as ICR-Restricted or ICR-Refed for data obtained during these intervals. All mice consumed the same absolute amount of dietary fat. Mice were followed to assess MT incidence, body weight and serum IGF-1, IGFBP3, leptin and adiponectin levels until 79 (end of final 3-week restriction) or 82 (end of final 3-weeks refeeding) weeks of age. Age of MT detection was significantly extended for CCR (74 weeks) and ICR (82 weeks) mice, compared to 57.5 weeks for AL mice. MT incidence for AL, ICR and CCR mice was 66.7, 4.4, and 52.3 %, respectively. Mammary and fat pad weights were reduced significantly following 50 % calorie restriction in ICR-Restricted mice compared to AL, CCR and ICR-Refed mice. IGF-1 and leptin levels also tended to be reduced in ICR-Restricted mice over the course of the study while adiponectin was not compared to AL, CCR, and ICR-Refed mice. The adiponectin:leptin ratio was consistently higher following 50 % restriction in ICR-Restricted mice. There was no relationship of IGF-1, leptin, or adiponectin with the presence of MTs in any groups. Thus the manner in which calories are restricted impacts the protective effect of calorie restriction independently of high fat intake.

Indexed as

Caloric RestrictionDiet, High-FatAdiponectinAdipose TissueAnimalsBody WeightCell Transformation, NeoplasticEatingFemaleInsulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3Insulin-Like Growth Factor ILeptinMammary Neoplasms, ExperimentalMiceMice, TransgenicTransforming Growth Factor alphaAdiponectinInsulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3Insulin-Like Growth Factor ILeptinTransforming Growth Factor alpha

Identifiers

PMID23446811
PMCPMC3610797
OpenAlexW2021524969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.