Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23446786›Full record

ReviewDrug safety2012

Geriatric conditions and the risk of adverse drug reactions in older adults: a review.

Fabrizia Lattanzio, Francesco Landi, Silvia Bustacchini, Angela Marie Abbatecola, Francesco Corica, Luigi Pranno, Andrea Corsonello

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drug safety, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Application of Claims-based Frailty Index to a Structured Electronic Health Record Data.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Low Energy Trauma in Older Persons: Where to Next?The open orthopaedics journal · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fabrizia LattanzioScientific Direction, Italian National Research Center on Aging (INRCA), Ancona, Italy.
Francesco Landi
Silvia Bustacchini
Angela Marie Abbatecola
Francesco Corica
Luigi Pranno
Andrea Corsonello

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While polypathology and polypharmacy are well known risk factors for adverse drug reactions (ADRs), the association between geriatric conditions (GCs), i.e. a set of clinical and functional problems partly constitutive of and partly related to frailty, and ADRs is suspected but has not been fully elucidated. Several studies have assessed the relationship between single GCs and ADRs, but only a few studies have systematically evaluated the relationship between the whole spectrum of GCs and ADRs. The mechanism by which select GCs increase the risk of developing ADRs during a hospital stay might simply reflect a sort of general predictability of physical disability with respect to adverse outcomes. However, GCs pertaining to the physical dimension of frailty are generally associated with relevant changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of select drugs. While current evidence could not be considered either unequivocal or conclusive, select GCs, e.g. a history of falls and loss of independence in the activities of daily living, seem to define a condition of particular vulnerability of elderly patients to ADRs.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsActivities of Daily LivingAgedDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansPolypharmacyRisk

Identifiers

PMID23446786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.