Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23446545›Full record

SynthesisNature reviews. Cancer2013

Translational control of cell growth and malignancy by the CPEBs.

Andrea D'Ambrogio, Kentaro Nagaoka, Joel D Richter

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrea D'AmbrogioThe Program in Molecular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01605, USA.
Kentaro Nagaoka
Joel D Richter
Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology · JPUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding proteins (CPEBs) associate with specific sequences in mRNA 3' untranslated regions to promote translation. They do so by inducing cytoplasmic polyadenylation, which requires specialized poly(A) polymerases. Aberrant expression of these proteins correlates with certain types of cancer, indicating that cytoplasmic RNA 3' end processing is important in the control of growth. Several CPEB-regulated mRNAs govern cell cycle progression, regulate senescence, establish cell polarity, and promote tumorigenesis and metastasis. In this Opinion article, we discuss the emerging evidence that indicates a key role for the CPEBs in cancer biology.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsAnimalsCell CycleCell ProliferationCellular SenescenceHumansmRNA Cleavage and Polyadenylation FactorsPolynucleotide AdenylyltransferaseProtein BiosynthesisRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, MessengerTranscription FactorsCPEB1 protein, humanCPEB2 protein, humanCPEB3 protein, humanCPEB4 protein, humanmRNA Cleavage and Polyadenylation FactorsPolynucleotide AdenylyltransferaseRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, MessengerTENT2 protein, humanTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID23446545
OpenAlexW2003756264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.