Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23446219›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2013

Evaluation of the safety and immunogenicity of a candidate tuberculosis vaccine, MVA85A, delivered by aerosol to the lungs of macaques.

A D White, L Sibley, M J Dennis, K Gooch, G Betts, N Edwards, A Reyes-Sandoval, M W Carroll, A Williams, P D Marsh and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The Immunogenicity and Safety ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Synthetic protein conjugate vaccines provide protection againstProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A D WhiteHealth Protection Agency, Microbiological Services Division, Porton Down, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
L Sibley
M J Dennis
K Gooch
G Betts
N Edwards
A Reyes-Sandoval
M W Carroll
A Williams
P D Marsh
H McShane
S A Sharpe
Jenner Institute · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 095780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) is a reemerging disease. The only available vaccine, Mycobacterium bovis BCG, is delivered intradermally and confers highly variable efficacy against pulmonary disease. There is an urgent need for improved vaccination strategies. Murine studies suggest that immunizations delivered directly to the respiratory mucosa might be a more effective route of vaccination. This study compared the immunogenicity of a leading candidate tuberculosis (TB) vaccine, modified vaccinia virus Ankara expressing antigen 85A (MVA85A), in rhesus macaques, delivered either as an aerosol or as an intradermal boost immunization 12 weeks after an intradermal BCG prime vaccine. Aerosol vaccination was well tolerated. MVA85A delivered by aerosol or by intradermal injection induced antigen-specific immune responses in the periphery and the lung, with a trend toward the highest response when the compartment and route of delivery were matched. The ability of poxvirus-vectored vaccines delivered by the systemic route to induce responses in the mucosal immune compartment in macaques is in contrast to the independent compartmentalization of mucosal and systemic immune systems described in mice. Unlike intradermal vaccination, aerosol vaccination did not induce a detectable serum anti-vector antibody response. The delivery of vaccines to the lungs might provide an immunization strategy that limits the induction of systemic anti-vector immunity, which would be extremely useful in the development of improved vaccine strategies. This is the first study to show a recombinant MVA-vectored vaccine to be highly immunogenic when delivered by the aerosol route to nonhuman primates. These results provide important safety and proof-of-concept data for further evaluation of this route of immunization for use in human clinical trials.

Indexed as

Tuberculosis VaccinesAdministration, InhalationAnimalsAntigens, BacterialBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesImmunity, MucosalImmunization, SecondaryMacacaMycobacterium bovisTuberculosisVaccinationVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, DNAVaccines, SyntheticAntigens, BacterialMVA 85ATuberculosis VaccinesVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, DNAVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID23446219
PMCPMC3647747
OpenAlexW1980489153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.