Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23446180›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical informatics and decision making2013

Cost effectiveness of a computer-delivered intervention to improve HIV medication adherence.

Raymond L Ownby, Drenna Waldrop-Valverde, Robin J Jacobs, Amarilis Acevedo, Joshua Caballero

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01304186 (An Automated, Tailored Information Application for Medication Health Literacy), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01304186 nacompletednot on this map

An Automated, Tailored Information Application for Medication Health Literacy

TypeinterventionalSponsorNova Southeastern UniversityRan2010 to 2012Enrolled124ConditionsHuman Immunodeficiency Virus I InfectionArmsTailored Information
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Negative and positive beliefs related to mood and health.American journal of health behavior · 2014
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Raymond L OwnbyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Room 1477, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316, USA. ro71@nova.edu
Drenna Waldrop-Valverde
Robin J Jacobs
Amarilis Acevedo
Joshua Caballero
Nova Southeastern University · USEmory University · US

Funding

An Automated, Tailored Information Application for Medication Health LiteracyR21MH086491 · NIMH · NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI OWNBY, RAYMOND L · 2009 to 2010
$345k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH086491NIMH NIH HHS R21MH086491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh levels of adherence to medications for HIV infection are essential for optimal clinical outcomes and to reduce viral transmission, but many patients do not achieve required levels. Clinician-delivered interventions can improve patients' adherence, but usually require substantial effort by trained individuals and may not be widely available. Computer-delivered interventions can address this problem by reducing required staff time for delivery and by making the interventions widely available via the Internet. We previously developed a computer-delivered intervention designed to improve patients' level of health literacy as a strategy to improve their HIV medication adherence. The intervention was shown to increase patients' adherence, but it was not clear that the benefits resulting from the increase in adherence could justify the costs of developing and deploying the intervention. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relation of development and deployment costs to the effectiveness of the intervention.

methodsCosts of intervention development were drawn from accounting reports for the grant under which its development was supported, adjusted for costs primarily resulting from the project's research purpose. Effectiveness of the intervention was drawn from results of the parent study. The relation of the intervention's effects to changes in health status, expressed as utilities, was also evaluated in order to assess the net cost of the intervention in terms of quality adjusted life years (QALYs). Sensitivity analyses evaluated ranges of possible intervention effectiveness and durations of its effects, and costs were evaluated over several deployment scenarios.

resultsThe intervention's cost effectiveness depends largely on the number of persons using it and the duration of its effectiveness. Even with modest effects for a small number of patients the intervention was associated with net cost savings in some scenarios and for durations greater than three months and longer it was usually associated with a favorable cost per QALY. For intermediate and larger assumed effects and longer durations of intervention effectiveness, the intervention was associated with net cost savings.

conclusionsComputer-delivered adherence interventions may be a cost-effective strategy to improve adherence in persons treated for HIV.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01304186.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringCD4 Lymphocyte CountCost SavingsHealth LiteracyHealth StatusHIV InfectionsHumansProgram DevelopmentProgram EvaluationQuality-Adjusted Life YearsSalaries and Fringe Benefits

Identifiers

PMID23446180
PMCPMC3599639
OpenAlexW2010949074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.