ArticleBMC gastroenterology2013
Management of stage II colon cancer - the use of molecular biomarkers for adjuvant therapy decision.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-Analysis of the Prognostic and Predictive Role of the CpG Island Methylator Phenotype in Colorectal Cancer.Disease markers · 2022Pooled it
- Global differences in the prevalence of the CpG island methylator phenotype of colorectal cancer.BMC cancer · 2019Pooled it
- Different definitions of CpG island methylator phenotype and outcomes of colorectal cancer: a systematic review.Clinical epigenetics · 2016Pooled it
- Prognostic value of CpG island methylator phenotype among colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2014Pooled it
- Prognostic Effect of Ultra-Staging Node-Negative Colon Cancer Without Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Prospective National Cancer Institute-Sponsored Clinical Trial.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2015Trial
- Review
- Expression of Thymidylate Synthase in Cancer: A Tissue Microarray Study Involving 17,371 Cancers from 136 Tumor Entities.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Protein prognostic biomarkers in stage II colorectal cancer: implications for post-operative management.BJC reports · 2024Review
- Stage III deficient mismatch repair colon patients get greater benefit from earlier starting oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy regimen.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Approaches to Treat Colorectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Literature.Cureus · 2023Review
- Computed Tomography-Based Radiomics Model to Preoperatively Predict Microsatellite Instability Status in Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Study.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Genomic Alterations and Their Implications on Survival in Nonmetastatic Colorectal Cancer: Status Quo and Future Perspectives.Cancers · 2020Review
- Clinical, Pathological, and Molecular Characteristics of CpG Island Methylator Phenotype in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Translational oncology · 2018Article
- Pathway analysis of genetic variants in folate-mediated one-carbon metabolism-related genes and survival in a prospectively followed cohort of colorectal cancer patients.Cancer medicine · 2018Article
- DNA hypermethylation as a predictor of extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) in rectal cancer.Cancer biology & therapy · 2018Article
- Review
- Overview on Clinical Relevance of Intra-Tumor Heterogeneity.Frontiers in medicine · 2018Review
- Colorectal cancer: epigenetic alterations and their clinical implications.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2017Review
- Identification of a sixteen-microRNA signature as prognostic biomarker for stage II and III colon cancer.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- DNA methylation aberrancies as a guide for surveillance and treatment of human cancers.Epigenetics · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is uncertainty on the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II colorectal cancers. The aim of this study is to investigate the combined role of clinical, pathological and molecular parameters to identify those stage II patients who better benefit from adjuvant therapy.
methodsWe examined 120 stage II colon cancer patients. Of these, 60 patients received adjuvant 5-FU chemotherapy after surgery and the other 60 did not receive therapy. Immunohistochemical (IHC) analyses were performed to evaluate the expressions of Thymidylate synthetase (TYMS), TP53 (p53), β-catenin (CTNNB1) and CD8. For TYMS, its mRNA expression levels were also investigated by real time qRT-PCR. The entire case study was characterized by the presence of a defect in the MMR (mismatch repair) system, the presence of the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP or CIMP-High) and for the V600E mutation in the BRAF gene. At the histo-pathological level, the depth of tumour invasion, lymphovascular invasion, invasion of large veins, host lymphocytic response and tumour border configuration were recorded.
resultsThe presence of the V600E mutation in the BRAF gene was a poor prognostic factor for disease free and overall survival (DFS; hazard ratio [HR], 2.57; 95% CI: 1.03 -6.37; p = 0.04 and OS; HR, 3.68; 95% CI: 1.43-9.47; p < 0.01 respectively), independently of 5-FU treatment. Adjuvant therapy significantly improved survival in patients with high TYMS levels (p = 0.04), while patients with low TYMS had a better outcome if treated by surgery alone (DFS; HR, 6.07; 95% CI, 0.82 to 44.89; p = 0.04). In patients with a defect in the MMR system (dMMR), 5-FU therapy was associated to reduced survival (DFS; HR, 37.98; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1381.31; p = 0.04), while it was beneficial for CIMP-High associated tumours (DFS; HR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.02 to 1.13; p = 0.05).
conclusionsPatients' characterization according to MMR status, CIMP phenotype and TYMS mRNA expression may provide a more tailored approach for adjuvant therapy in stage II colon cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.