Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23445659›Full record

ArticleBMC immunology2013

Blomia tropicalis Blo t 5 and Blo t 21 recombinant allergens might confer higher specificity to serodiagnostic assays than whole mite extract.

Kellyanne dos Anjos Carvalho, Osvaldo Pompílio de Melo-Neto, Franklin Barbalho Magalhães, João Carlos Marques Ponte, Filipe Adriano Borba Felipe, Mariese Conceição Alves dos Santos, Givaneide dos Santos Lima, Álvaro Augusto Cruz, Carina Silva Pinheiro, Lain Carlos Pontes-de-Carvalho and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC immunology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Conjunctival Provocation Test WithFrontiers in allergy · 2021
    Article
  9. A hybrid of two major Blomia tropicalis allergens as an allergy vaccine candidate.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Allergens of Blomia tropicalis: An Overview of Recombinant Molecules.International archives of allergy and immunology · 2017
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Particularities of allergy in the Tropics.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2016
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kellyanne dos Anjos CarvalhoLaboratório de Alergia e Acarologia, Instituto de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Avenida Reitor Miguel Calmon, sem nº, Canela, Salvador, Bahia CEP 40110-100, Brazil.
Osvaldo Pompílio de Melo-Neto
Franklin Barbalho Magalhães
João Carlos Marques Ponte
Filipe Adriano Borba Felipe
Mariese Conceição Alves dos Santos
Givaneide dos Santos Lima
Álvaro Augusto Cruz
Carina Silva Pinheiro
Lain Carlos Pontes-de-Carvalho
Neuza Maria Alcantara-Neves
Universidade Federal da Bahia · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRAssociação Caruaruense de Ensino Superior e Técnico · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlomia tropicalis is a dust mite and an important source of allergens in tropical regions. Up to now, the assays to diagnose atopy to this mite use whole body extract as antigens. However, anti-B. tropicalis IgE antibodies cross-react with Ascaris lumbricoides antigens, hindering the diagnosis of allergy to this mite. In this study, B. tropicalis recombinant allergens were evaluated with the purpose of developing an immunodiagnostic assay for allergy to this mite with greater specificity than those commercially available.

methodsTwo B. tropicalis allergens (Blo t 5 and Blo t 21) were cloned into a plasmidial expression vector, expressed in Escherichia coli and purified by affinity chromatography. Sixty-three sera containing anti-B. tropicalis extract (BtE) IgE antibodies were used to investigate IgE reactivity to the recombinant Blot 5 and 21 allergens. Inhibition assays with 20 sera pre-adsorbed with A. lumbricoides extract were performed using rBlo t 5, rBlo t 21, and BtE as antigens. All the assays were carried using indirect ELISA.

resultsEighty-two point nine percent and 80.0% of the sera with anti-BtE antibodies from 35 children reacted with rBlo t 5 and rBlo t 21, respectively, whereas 92.8% and 89.3% of the 28 sera with anti-BtE antibodies from adult asthma patients reacted with the same allergens, and 96.4% of these sera reacted with a mixture of rBlo t 5 and rBlo t 21. In an inhibition ELISA, the absorption of sera by A. lumbricoides extract affected less the reaction with rBlo t 5 and rBlo t 21 than with BtE.

conclusionsThe rBlo t 5 and rBlo t 21 allergens contain important epitopes recognized by IgE antibodies of individuals allergic to B. tropicalis antigens. Moreover, the assays using the recombinant allergens had lower IgE cross-reactivity with A. lumbricoides antigens, a fact which would confers higher specificity to serodiagnostic assays than the crude mite extract. However, additional recombinant allergens should be evaluated in order to reach the same sensitivity of the commercially available assays based on mite extract.

Indexed as

AdultAllergensAnimalsAntigens, HelminthAscarisChild, PreschoolComplex MixturesCross ReactionsHumansImmunoglobulin EMitesRecombinant Fusion ProteinsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySerologic TestsAllergensAntigens, HelminthComplex MixturesImmunoglobulin ERecombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23445659
PMCPMC3605308
OpenAlexW2020270527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.