Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23445048›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomechanical engineering2013

Subject-specific analysis of joint contact mechanics: application to the study of osteoarthritis and surgical planning.

Corinne R Henak, Andrew E Anderson, Jeffrey A Weiss

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. [Biomechanical analysis of ankle-foot complex during a typical Tai Chi movement-Brush Knee and Twist Step].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. High Tibial Osteotomy: Review of Techniques and Biomechanics.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Corinne R HenakDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Andrew E Anderson
Jeffrey A Weiss

Funding

Finite Elements For Biomechanics And BiophysicsR01GM083925 · NIGMS · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI GERARD A. ATESHIAN, JEFFREY A. WEISS · 2008 to 2026
$7.6M
Predicting cell deformation from body level mechanical loadsR01EB009643 · NIBIB · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI ERDEMIR, AHMET · 2009 to 2012
$1.7M
Biomechanics of the Dysplastic HipR01AR053344 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI WEISS, JEFFREY A. · 2007 to 2011
$1.3M
Computational Framework for Multiscale Mechanics of Connective TissuesR01EB015133 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI WEISS, JEFFREY A. · 2012 to 2015
$1.0M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR053344NIAMS NIH HHS R01AR053344NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB009643NIBIB NIH HHS R01EB009643NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB015133NIBIB NIH HHS R01EB015133NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083925NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM083925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in computational mechanics, constitutive modeling, and techniques for subject-specific modeling have opened the door to patient-specific simulation of the relationships between joint mechanics and osteoarthritis (OA), as well as patient-specific preoperative planning. This article reviews the application of computational biomechanics to the simulation of joint contact mechanics as relevant to the study of OA. This review begins with background regarding OA and the mechanical causes of OA in the context of simulations of joint mechanics. The broad range of technical considerations in creating validated subject-specific whole joint models is discussed. The types of computational models available for the study of joint mechanics are reviewed. The types of constitutive models that are available for articular cartilage are reviewed, with special attention to choosing an appropriate constitutive model for the application at hand. Issues related to model generation are discussed, including acquisition of model geometry from volumetric image data and specific considerations for acquisition of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging data. Approaches to model validation are reviewed. The areas of parametric analysis, factorial design, and probabilistic analysis are reviewed in the context of simulations of joint contact mechanics. Following the review of technical considerations, the article details insights that have been obtained from computational models of joint mechanics for normal joints; patient populations; the study of specific aspects of joint mechanics relevant to OA, such as congruency and instability; and preoperative planning. Finally, future directions for research and application are summarized.

Indexed as

Mechanical PhenomenaBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansJointsModels, BiologicalOsteoarthritisPrecision Medicine

Identifiers

PMID23445048
PMCPMC3705883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.