Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23443798›Full record

ReviewMolecular cancer therapeutics2013

FOX(M1) news--it is cancer.

Marianna Halasi, Andrei L Gartel

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular cancer therapeutics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 139 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
139citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

139 citing papers in PubMed, 215 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Regulation of HOX gene expression in AML.Blood cancer journal · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

79 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marianna HalasiUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, Department of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Andrei L Gartel
University of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Evaluation of novel FoxM1 inhibitors against liver cancerR01CA129414 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI GARTEL, ANDREI L · 2008 to 2012
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA1294414NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

FOXM1 is an oncogenic transcription factor of the Forkhead family and it has a well-defined role in cell proliferation and cell-cycle progression. Expression of FOXM1 is excluded in quiescent or differentiated cells, but its level is highly elevated in proliferating and malignant cells. Overexpression of FOXM1 has been reported in more than 20 types of human cancer. In recent years, FOXM1 has been implicated in diverse cellular processes and also a growing body of experimental data has underlined the relevance of FOXM1 in tumorigenesis. Although FOXM1 is under the control of three major tumor suppressors (RB, p53, and p19(ARF)), it is still active in the majority of human cancers. The oncogenic potential of FOXM1 is mainly based on its ability to transcriptionally activate genes that are involved in different facets of cancer development. In this review, the contribution of FOXM1 to each of the hallmarks of cancer will be summarized and discussed.

Indexed as

Cell Cycle CheckpointsCell ProliferationCell Transformation, NeoplasticForkhead Box Protein M1Forkhead Transcription FactorsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansNeoplasmsTranscriptional ActivationForkhead Box Protein M1Forkhead Transcription FactorsFOXM1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID23443798
PMCPMC3596487
OpenAlexW2115662954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.