Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23443744›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2014

Titanium elastic nails, open reduction internal fixation and non-operative management for middle third clavicle fractures: a comparative study.

Luke D Jones, George Grammatopoulos, Gregoris Kambouroglou

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. The clinical symptom profile of early radiographic knee arthritis: a pain and function comparison with advanced disease.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luke D Jones, Oxford, UK, luke.jones@ndorms.ox.ac.uk.
George Grammatopoulos
Gregoris Kambouroglou
Science Oxford · GBJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare clinical outcomes between titanium elastic nails (TENS), open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and non-operative treatment options at mean 30 months in Allman type 1 fractures of the clavicle.

designRetrospective case matched.

settingTertiary Trauma Centre, UK. PATIENTS: Treatment method was based on surgeon choice although there was no difference between groups in terms of age or gender. Those treated non-operatively tended to have a less severe fracture pattern. There were 25 patients treated with TENS, 24 with ORIF and 41 treated conservatively. Main outcome measurements are qDASH questionnaire, patient satisfaction question and clinical complication rate.

resultsPatients managed with TENS had significantly better clinical outcomes than both plate fixation and non-operatively managed groups.

conclusionsThis study supports the use of TENS fixation of middle third clavicle fractures in significantly displaced Allman type 1 injuries.

Indexed as

Bone NailsFracture Fixation, InternalTitaniumAdultBone PlatesCase-Control StudiesClavicleFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFractures, BoneHumansMalePatient SatisfactionRadiographyRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTitanium

Identifiers

PMID23443744
OpenAlexW2079745129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.