Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23443509›Full record

Trial reportAge and ageing2013

Effect of telecare on use of health and social care services: findings from the Whole Systems Demonstrator cluster randomised trial.

Adam Steventon, Martin Bardsley, John Billings, Jennifer Dixon, Helen Doll, Michelle Beynon, Shashi Hirani, Martin Cartwright, Lorna Rixon, Martin Knapp and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Age and ageing, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03713333 (Implementation of High Definition Screening Using Handheld Imaging and Digital Health Technologies Within a Learning Health System to Identify Cardiovascular Disease at the Point-of-care), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03713333 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Implementation of High Definition Screening Using Handheld Imaging and Digital Health Technologies Within a Learning Health System to Identify Cardiovascular Disease at the Point-of-care: The ASE-INNOVATE Program

TypeinterventionalSponsorScripps HealthRan2018 to 2020Enrolled374ConditionsCardiovascular Diseases, Hypertension, Heart Failure, Atrial FibrillationArmsDigital Health Device Diagnostics
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Interventions to Promote Early Discharge and Avoid Inappropriate Hospital (Re)Admission: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Experiences of front-line health professionals in the delivery of telehealth: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Adam SteventonThe Nuffield Trust, London, UK. adam.steventon@nuffieldtrust.org.uk
Martin Bardsley
John Billings
Jennifer Dixon
Helen Doll
Michelle Beynon
Shashi Hirani
Martin Cartwright
Lorna Rixon
Martin Knapp
Catherine Henderson
Anne Rogers
Jane Hendy
Ray Fitzpatrick
Stanton Newman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveto assess the impact of telecare on the use of social and health care. Part of the evaluation of the Whole Systems Demonstrator trial. PARTICIPANTS AND

settinga total of 2,600 people with social care needs were recruited from 217 general practices in three areas in England.

designa cluster randomised trial comparing telecare with usual care, general practice being the unit of randomisation. Participants were followed up for 12 months and analyses were conducted as intention-to-treat. DATA SOURCES: trial data were linked at the person level to administrative data sets on care funded at least in part by local authorities or the National Health Service.

main outcome measuresthe proportion of people admitted to hospital within 12 months. Secondary endpoints included mortality, rates of secondary care use (seven different metrics), contacts with general practitioners and practice nurses, proportion of people admitted to permanent residential or nursing care, weeks in domiciliary social care and notional costs.

results46.8% of intervention participants were admitted to hospital, compared with 49.2% of controls. Unadjusted differences were not statistically significant (odds ratio: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.75-1.07, P = 0.211). They reached statistical significance after adjusting for baseline covariates, but this was not replicated when adjusting for the predictive risk score. Secondary metrics including impacts on social care use were not statistically significant.

conclusionstelecare as implemented in the Whole Systems Demonstrator trial did not lead to significant reductions in service use, at least in terms of results assessed over 12 months.

Indexed as

Health ServicesPatient AdmissionState MedicineTelemedicineAgedAged, 80 and overCause of DeathCost SavingsEnglandFemaleGeneral PracticeHealth Care CostsHome Care ServicesHumansIntention to Treat AnalysisLogistic Modelsadministrative dataassistive technologyolder peoplerandomised controlled trialtelecare

Identifiers

PMID23443509
PMCPMC3684109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.