ArticleEuropean radiology2013
Coblation vertebroplasty for complex vertebral insufficiency fractures.
Article in European radiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of cement augmentation with percutaneous vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures in multiple myeloma: a consensus statement from the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG).Blood cancer journal · 2019Article
- Safety and Clinical Effectiveness of Percutaneous Vertebroplasty in the Elderly (≥80 years).European radiology · 2016Article
- Vertebral augmentation for neoplastic lesions with posterior wall erosion and epidural mass.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesCoblation to create a cavity in the affected vertebral body was performed for complex fractures and/or when there was a posterior wall defect. This permitted a low-pressure injection and potentially reduces the risk of extravasation of cement into the spinal canal.
methodsProspective audit for outcome measures and complications allowed retrospective review of cases treated by coblation. A commercial wand inserted via a wide-bore vertebroplasty needle created a cavity before inserting cement. A visual analogue scale assessed pain and Roland Morris scoring assessed mobility.
resultsThirty-two coblation procedures were performed. Primary diagnoses were myeloma, metastases, osteoporosis and trauma. Outcome measures were recorded with a 56 % success rate, 6 % no change and 32 % with mixed but mainly positive results; 6 % died before follow-up. No complications were observed; in particular no patient suffered neurological damage and none have developed subsequent fractures at the treated levels.
conclusionsThis technique makes possible cementation of patients who would otherwise be unsuitable for vertebroplasty. The modest pain and disability improvement is partly due to our stringent criteria as well as fracture complexity. Further work will assess the efficacy of the method compared with conservative measures. KEY POINTS: • Treatment of vertebral compression fractures with possible posterior wall defects is controversial. • Coblation before vertebroplasty allows a low-pressure injection into fractured vertebrae. • This technique reduces risk of extravasation of cement. • No serious complication of our coblation procedures was observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.