Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23442914›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2013

Membrane interactions and pore formation by the antimicrobial peptide protegrin.

Themis Lazaridis, Yi He, Lidia Prieto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Computational studies of peptide-induced membrane pore formation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Computational prediction of the optimal oligomeric state for membrane-inserted β-barrels of protegrin-1 and related mutants.Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Peptides and Peptidomimetics for Antimicrobial Drug Design.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Themis LazaridisDepartment of Chemistry, City College of New York/CUNY, New York, New York, USA. tlazaridis@ccny.cuny.edu
Yi He
Lidia Prieto

Funding

TNC FUNCTION IN APOPTOTIC ANTIGEN DRIVEN AUTOIMMUNITYG12RR003060 · NCRR · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI WALLMAN, JOSHUA · 1985 to 2011
$26.1M
Cellular/Molecular Basis of Development: Research CenterG12MD007603 · NIMHD · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI PEZZANO, MARK · 2012 to 2017
$11.5M
Modeling Membrane Binding and Permeabilization by Antimicrobial PeptidesSC1AI084899 · NIAID · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI LAZARIDIS, THEMIS · 2009 to 2012
$1.0M
The role of gammaherpesvirus protein kinase in lytic and latent infectionR56AI084889 · NIAID · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI TARAKANOVA, VERA L. · 2010 to 2010
$378k
NCRR NIH HHS 2G12RR03060-26ANCRR NIH HHS G12 RR003060NIAID NIH HHS SC1-AI084889NIAID NIH HHS SC1 AI084899NIMHD NIH HHS 8G12MD007603-27NIMHD NIH HHS G12 MD007603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protegrin is an antimicrobial peptide with a β-hairpin structure stabilized by a pair of disulfide bonds. It has been extensively studied by solid-state NMR and computational methods. Here we use implicit membrane models to examine the binding of monomers on the surface and in the interior of the membrane, the energetics of dimerization, the binding to membrane pores, and the stability of different membrane barrel structures in pores. Our results challenge a number of conclusions based on previous experimental and theoretical work. The burial of monomers into the membrane interior is found to be unfavorable for any membrane thickness. Because of its imperfect amphipathicity, protegrin binds weakly, at most, on the surface of zwitterionic membranes. However, it binds more favorably onto toroidal pores. Anionic charge on the membrane facilitates the binding due to electrostatic interactions. Solid-state NMR results have suggested a parallel NCCN association of monomers in dimers and association of dimers to form octameric or decameric β-barrels. We find that this structure is not energetically plausible for binding to bilayers, because in this configuration the hydrophobic sides of two monomers point in opposite directions. In contrast, the antiparallel NCCN and especially the parallel NCNC octamers are stable and exhibit a favorable binding energy to the pore. The results of 100-ns simulations in explicit bilayers corroborate the higher stability of the parallel NCNC barrel compared with the parallel NCCN barrel. The ability to form pores in zwitterionic membranes provides a rationalization for the peptide's cytotoxicity. The discrepancies between our results and experiment are discussed, and new experiments are proposed to resolve them and to test the validity of the models.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationAmino Acid SequenceAnionsAnti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesCell MembraneHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsLipid BilayersLipidsMolecular Sequence DataProtein BindingProtein MultimerizationProtein SubunitsStatic ElectricityAnionsAnti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesLipid BilayersLipidsProtein Subunits

Identifiers

PMID23442914
PMCPMC3566446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.