ArticleBMC structural biology2013
Designing and benchmarking the MULTICOM protein structure prediction system.
Article in BMC structural biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting Protein Conformational Disorder and Disordered Binding Sites.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Cryo-EM structure of the human ELMO1-DOCK5-Rac1 complex.Science advances · 2021Article
- Protein tertiary structure modeling driven by deep learning and contact distance prediction in CASP13.Proteins · 2019Article
- Identification and localization of Tospovirus genus-wide conserved residues in 3D models of the nucleocapsid and the silencing suppressor proteins.Virology journal · 2019Article
- Dissecting KMT2D missense mutations in Kabuki syndrome patients.Human molecular genetics · 2018Article
- Determination of protein oligomeric structure from small-angle X-ray scattering.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2018Review
- Prediction of Local Quality of Protein Structure Models Considering Spatial Neighbors in Graphical Models.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- A Stochastic Point Cloud Sampling Method for Multi-Template Protein Comparative Modeling.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- A large-scale conformation sampling and evaluation server for protein tertiary structure prediction and its assessment in CASP11.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Large-scale model quality assessment for improving protein tertiary structure prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2015Article
- An Improved Integration of Template-Based and Template-Free Protein Structure Modeling Methods and its Assessment in CASP11.Protein and peptide letters · 2015Article
- PCP-ML: protein characterization package for machine learning.BMC research notes · 2014Article
- Predicting Protein Model Quality from Sequence Alignments by Support Vector Machines.Journal of proteomics & bioinformatics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPredicting protein structure from sequence is one of the most significant and challenging problems in bioinformatics. Numerous bioinformatics techniques and tools have been developed to tackle almost every aspect of protein structure prediction ranging from structural feature prediction, template identification and query-template alignment to structure sampling, model quality assessment, and model refinement. How to synergistically select, integrate and improve the strengths of the complementary techniques at each prediction stage and build a high-performance system is becoming a critical issue for constructing a successful, competitive protein structure predictor.
resultsOver the past several years, we have constructed a standalone protein structure prediction system MULTICOM that combines multiple sources of information and complementary methods at all five stages of the protein structure prediction process including template identification, template combination, model generation, model assessment, and model refinement. The system was blindly tested during the ninth Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction (CASP9) in 2010 and yielded very good performance. In addition to studying the overall performance on the CASP9 benchmark, we thoroughly investigated the performance and contributions of each component at each stage of prediction.
conclusionsOur comprehensive and comparative study not only provides useful and practical insights about how to select, improve, and integrate complementary methods to build a cutting-edge protein structure prediction system but also identifies a few new sources of information that may help improve the design of a protein structure prediction system. Several components used in the MULTICOM system are available at: http://sysbio.rnet.missouri.edu/multicom_toolbox/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.