ReviewChemical reviews2013
Mass spectrometry of structurally modified DNA.
Review in Chemical reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed.
- Frequent Detection of Abasic Sites andChemical research in toxicology · 2026Article
- Identifying Novel DNA Adducts in Amphipods and Developing Sample Preparation for Adductomics Using Dispersive Solid-Phase Extraction.Environmental science & technology · 2025Article
- Genome-wide mapping and quantification of DNA damage induced by catechol estrogens using Click-Probe-Seq and LC-MSCommunications biology · 2025Article
- Global DNA-methylation in quantitative epigenetics: orbitrap mass spectrometry.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Article
- Pioneering contribution of Professor Bruce Ames to early development in biochemical aspects of oxidatively generated damage to DNA.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Review
- Multi-adductomics: Advancing mass spectrometry techniques for comprehensive exposome characterization.Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2024Article
- Article
- Negative Electron Transfer Collision-Induced Dissociation of G-Quadruplexes: Uncovering the Guanine Radical Anion Loss Pathway.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2024Article
- Screening DNA Damage in the Rat Kidney and Liver by Untargeted DNA Adductomics.Chemical research in toxicology · 2024Article
- Mass Spectral Library for DNA Adductomics.Chemical research in toxicology · 2024Article
- Gas-Phase Fragmentation as a Probe of G-Quadruplex Formation.Analytical chemistry · 2023Article
- DNA Adductomics for the Biological Effect Assessment of Contaminant Exposure in Marine Sediments.Environmental science & technology · 2023Article
- Navigating the pitfalls of mapping DNA and RNA modifications.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2023Review
- Single-strand mismatch and damage patterns revealed by single-molecule DNA sequencing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Pathways to Identify ElectrophilesChemical research in toxicology · 2022Article
- Two-dimensional nanostructures based '-onics' and '-omics' in personalized medicine.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2022Review
- LC-MS/MS for Assessing the Incorporation and Repair ofChemical research in toxicology · 2022Article
- DNA Adductomics by mass tag prelabeling.Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM · 2021Article
- Is high resolution a strict requirement for mass spectrometry-based cellular DNA adductomics?Chemosphere · 2021Article
- A Compositional Model to Predict the Aggregated Isotope Distribution for Average DNA and RNA Oligonucleotides.Metabolites · 2021Article
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.