Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23440521›Full record

ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2013

Ecarin modified rotational thrombelastometry: a point-of-care applicable alternative to monitor the direct thrombin inhibitor argatroban.

Eva Schaden, Andreas Schober, Stefan Hacker, Sibylle Kozek-Langenecker

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. [Rotational thromboelastometry for the diagnosis of coagulation disorders].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2018
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eva SchadenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, General Intensive Care and Pain Control, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. eva.schaden@meduniwien.ac.at
Andreas Schober
Stefan Hacker
Sibylle Kozek-Langenecker

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdequate monitoring of the effect of the direct thrombin inhibitor argatroban may facilitate individualized dosing and perioperative management of anticoagulation. Ecarin Clotting Time is proposed for this purpose, but has the major disadvantage of limited availability. There is a point-of-care applicable ecarin-activated test modification for rotational thrombelastometry (ROTEM®) which is sensitive to direct thrombin inhibitors. The aim of the study was to evaluate the correlation between argatroban concentration and this ecarin modified thrombelastometry (EMT).

methodsIn this in vitro experiment, blood drawn from healthy volunteers was spiked with argatroban at clinically relevant concentrations and analyzed with ROTEM® using EMT. The main endpoint was the clotting time (CT).

resultsEMT-CT was prolonged with increasing argatroban concentrations (from 83.3 ± 6.7 s without argatroban to 743.5 ± 138.2 s at 2 μg/ml argatroban). The correlation between argatroban concentration and EMT-CT was high (r = 0.94) and statistically significant (p < 0.01).

conclusionThese promising preclinical results mandate further clinical research to determine an EMT-CT target range regarding the clinical outcomes of thrombosis and bleeding.

Indexed as

Point-of-Care SystemsAntithrombinsArginineBlood CoagulationDrug MonitoringEndopeptidasesFibrinolytic AgentsHumansPipecolic AcidsSulfonamidesThrombelastographyAntithrombinsargatrobanArginineecarinEndopeptidasesFibrinolytic AgentsPipecolic AcidsSulfonamides

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.