Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23440411›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2013

Disparate roles for STAT5 in primary and secondary CTL responses.

Diana M Mitchell, Matthew A Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Diana M MitchellDepartment of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Matthew A Williams

Funding

The role of antigenic stimulatory strength in the selection and differentiation oR01AI080830 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI WILLIAMS, MATTHEW A · 2010 to 2014
$1.8M
The role of IL-2 in promoting CD8 memory T cell responsivenessK22AI071112 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI WILLIAMS, MATTHEW A · 2007 to 2008
$268k
NIAID NIH HHS K22 AI071112NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI080830NIAID NIH HHS R01AI080830
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IL-2 signals during the primary response to infection are essential in shaping CD8(+) T cell fate decisions. How CD8(+) T cells integrate IL-2 signals in the development of functional memory is not well understood. Because IL-2 induces potent activation of the STAT5 transcription factor, we tested the role of STAT5 in CD8(+) memory T cell differentiation and function using a model system in which STAT5 activity is inducibly abrogated upon CD8(+) T cell activation. We report that STAT5 activity is broadly important for the expansion and effector function of all effector CTL subsets. After pathogen clearance, STAT5 was required for the survival of effector phenotype memory CTLs during the contraction phase. However, despite its role in supporting full primary CD8(+) T cell expansion, and unlike IL-2, STAT5 activity is not required for the development of memory CD8(+) T cells capable of robust secondary expansion upon rechallenge. Our findings highlight differential requirements for survival signals between primary and secondary effector CTL, and demonstrate that IL-2-dependent programming of memory CD8(+) T cells capable of secondary expansion and secondary effector differentiation is largely STAT5 independent.

Indexed as

Immunologic MemoryAnimalsArenaviridae InfectionsCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCell DifferentiationGene ExpressionInterleukin-2Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virusMiceMice, KnockoutSignal TransductionSTAT5 Transcription FactorT-Lymphocytes, CytotoxicInterleukin-2STAT5 Transcription Factor

Identifiers

PMID23440411
PMCPMC3608757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.