Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23440376›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2013

[Capillaroscopy. An update].

J Richter, C Iking-Konert, M Schneider, O Sander

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Systemic lupus erythematosus : Unusual cutaneous manifestations].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2016
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J RichterPoliklinik für Rheumatologie, Heinrich Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
C Iking-Konert
M Schneider
O Sander

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article reports relevant innovations 2 years after the publication of the German consensus on nomenclature and procedure of capillaroscopy in this journal. Standardization: certified training courses in capillaroscopy under the patronage of the Rheumatism Academy have reached over 300 rheumatologists nationwide. Trained investigators clearly show greater agreement on findings than untrained experts even with years of experience. Normal findings were detected using the published terminology in a large cohort. Scientific application: the number of publications on capillaroscopy has risen significantly, prospective studies of smaller cohorts and the comparison to other methods regarding systemic sclerosis, Raynaud's disease and also miscellaneous diseases. A large prospective multicenter European study on the capillaroscopic skin ulcer risk index (CSURI) was conducted with German participation. The role as a screening tool has been confirmed by the majority of the studies. For systemic lupus erythematosus it is also increasingly being used in the diagnostic work-up as an additional investigation. Practical application: capillaroscopy has a solid and indispensable role in the diagnostic algorithm of Raynaud's disease and early diagnosis of systemic sclerosis. Videocapillaroscopy and simple USB microscopes are increasingly being used besides traditional light microscopy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCapillariesConnective Tissue DiseasesCurriculumEducation, Medical, ContinuingGermanyHumansLupus Erythematosus, SystemicMicroscopic AngioscopyMiddle AgedRaynaud DiseaseReference ValuesRheumatology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.