Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23440339›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2013

A systematic review of comparative studies on bone graft alternatives for common spine fusion procedures.

Charla R Fischer, Ryan Cassilly, Winifred Cantor, Emmanuel Edusei, Qusai Hammouri, Thomas Errico

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03407560 (Use of the Bone Substitute SintLife® in Vertebral Arthrodesis Procedures. A Pilot Study.), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03407560 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Use of the Bone Substitute SintLife® in Vertebral Arthrodesis Procedures. A Pilot Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstituto Ortopedico RizzoliRan2017 to 2021Enrolled16ConditionsSpinal FusionArmsSintLife
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Platelet concentrates in spine fusion: meta-analysis of union rates and complications in controlled trials.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. The impact of bone graft volume on risk of pseudarthrosis, screw loosening, and rod breakage in surgical correction of adult spinal deformity.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of bioactive glass in posterior cervical and lumbar spinal fusion.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Charla R FischerColumbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, PH11-1109, New York, NY 10032, USA. cdr2112@columbia.edu
Ryan Cassilly
Winifred Cantor
Emmanuel Edusei
Qusai Hammouri
Thomas Errico

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increased prevalence of spinal fusion surgery has created an industry focus on bone graft alternatives. While autologous bone graft remains the gold standard, the complications and morbidity from harvesting autologous bone drives the search for reliable and safe bone graft substitutes. With the recent information about the adverse events related to bone morhogenetic protein use, it is appropriate to review the literature about the numerous products that are not solely bone morphogenetic protein. PURPOSE: The purpose of this literature review is to determine the recommendations for use of non-bone morphogenetic protein bone graft alternatives in the most common spine procedures based on a quantifiable grading system. STUDY

designSystematic literature review.

methodsA literature search of MEDLINE (1946-2012), CINAHL (1937-2012), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (1940-April 2012) was performed, and this was supplemented by a hand search. The studies were then evaluated based on the Guyatt criteria for quality of the research to determine the strength of the recommendation.

resultsIn this review, more than one hundred various studies on the ability of bone graft substitutes to create solid fusions and good patient outcomes are detailed.

conclusionThe recommendations for use of bone graft substitutes and bone graft extenders are based on the strength of the studies and given a grade.

Indexed as

Bone SubstitutesBone TransplantationClinical Trials as TopicHumansSpinal FusionBone Substitutes

Identifiers

PMID23440339
PMCPMC3676568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.