Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23439719›Full record

ArticlePersonalized medicine2012

Clinical perspectives on human genetic screening to prevent nevirapine toxicity.

David W Haas, Piroon Mootsikapun, Kiat Ruxrungtham, Daniel Podzamczer, Nevirapine Toxicogenomics Study Team

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Personalized medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David W HaasDepartments of Medicine, Pharmacology, Pathology, Microbiology & Immunology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt Health - One Hundred Oaks, 719 Thompson Lane, Suite 47183, Nashville, TN 37204, USA.
Piroon Mootsikapun
Kiat Ruxrungtham
Daniel Podzamczer
Nevirapine Toxicogenomics Study Team

Funding

Pharmacogenomics of HIV TherapyR01AI077505 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI HAAS, DAVID W · 2008 to 2025
$12.3M
VIROLOGY COREP30AI054999 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI D'AQUILA, RICHARD · 2003 to 2011
$10.3M
Treatment of HIV/Tuberculosis Co-DiseaseU19AI053741 · NIAID · HIV-NAT, THE THAI RED CROSS AIDS RCH CTR · PI RUXRUNGTHAM, KIAT · 2004 to 2010
$6.3M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI054999NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI077505NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI053741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nevirapine is one of the most extensively prescribed antiretroviral drugs worldwide. However, a concern is increased risk for severe toxicity when antiretroviral-naive individuals with higher CD4 T-cell counts initiate nevirapine-containing regimens. Several genetic variants are associated with nevirapine toxicities. The authors used data from a previous study to anticipate potential consequences of genetic screening to prevent nevirapine adverse events. That study enrolled cohorts of African, Asian and European descent in 11 countries, including 276 patients who had experienced severe cutaneous and/or hepatic adverse events with nevirapine-containing regimens and 587 matched nevirapine-tolerant controls. Associations were identified with HLA-Cw*04, HLA-B*35, HLA-DRB*01 and CYP2B6 516G>T (rs3745274); however, positive predictive values for these genetic markers were low, and most nevirapine-associated adverse events occurred in patients without these markers. Unless better genetic predictors are identified, nevirapine toxicity is best avoided by continuing to follow current prescribing guidelines that are based largely on CD4 T-cell criteria.

Indexed as

CYP2B6HIVHLAnevirapinetoxicogenomics

Identifiers

PMID23439719
PMCPMC3579661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.