Trial reportJournal of diabetes science and technology2013
Self-adjustment of insulin dose using graphically depicted self-monitoring of blood glucose measurements in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.
Trial report in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance assessment of a closed-loop system for diabetes management.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2015Article
- Improving the Quality of Outpatient Diabetes Care Using an Information Management System: Results From the Observational VISION Study.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2015Observational
- 7(th) Annual Symposium on Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG), May 8-10, 2014, Helsinki, Finland.Diabetes technology & therapeutics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is a need for patients to be able to adjust their insulin doses accurately and independently during continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy in order to avoid glycemic excursions and improve glycemic control. Use of new technology has the potential to aid patients in visualizing their circadian patterns and improving their understanding of data provided by self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) measurements.
methodsA 24-week crossover study was performed in 25 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus using CSII and SMBG. Patients were randomized either to entering blood glucose data into handwritten logbooks or to using the Accu-Chek SmartPix information management system (IMS) coupled with instructions from a training manual to aid interpretation of the IMS readings. Patients analyzed these chart readings every 2 weeks, and outpatient visits were scheduled for both arms every 6 weeks.
resultsThere was a significantly lower mean overall blood glucose level with the IMS compared with use of a logbook (139 ± 16.2 versus 150 ± 19.8 mg/dl; Δ = 10.8 mg/dl; p < .01), and a significantly higher proportion of blood glucose values was in the target range compared with use of a logbook (43.6% versus 38.5%; p < .001). Hypoglycemic events were also significantly lower with the IMS compared with logbooks (3.7 fewer events/6 weeks; p < .05). There was no significant difference between groups in the daily frequency of SMBG measurements.
conclusionsThe use of an IMS, coupled with an easily understood training manual, enables patients to improve glycemic control by performing accurate and timely self-adjustments to their insulin regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.