ArticleJournal of biopharmaceutical statistics2013
Estimating vaccine efficacy under the heterogeneity of vaccine action in a nonrandomly mixing population.
Article in Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Vaccination Programs for Endemic Infections: Modelling Real versus Apparent Impacts of Vaccine and Infection Characteristics.Scientific reports · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vaccines often have heterogeneous actions because of possible variation in the immune systems of hosts. One must consider such heterogeneity of vaccine action when developing a vaccine efficacy parameter. Addressing this issue the summary model of vaccine action has been proposed in the literature to estimate vaccine efficacy in a randomly mixing population. However, nonrandom mixing is common, particularly in a small-group-mixing population. This article extends the summary model of vaccine action to such a nonrandomly mixing population. The interpretation and estimation of the summary vaccine efficacy were discussed in light of other two models of vaccine action: the leaky and all-or-nothing model. Vaccine efficacy under all models is defined as the relative reduction in transmission probability due to vaccine. Estimation of the transmission probabilities is described based on a deterministic epidemic model of an acute transmitted disease. This article further discusses, based on the above vaccine models, the estimation of vaccination coverage required to control epidemic. Methods are illustrated using data simulated by considering different patterns of mixing and vaccine action. Results confirm that the summary model performs better than other two models when vaccine action is heterogeneous.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.