Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23437175›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Comparative genomic analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug resistant strains from Russia.

Elena N Ilina, Egor A Shitikov, Larisa N Ikryannikova, Dmitry G Alekseev, Dmitri E Kamashev, Maja V Malakhova, Tatjana V Parfenova, Maxim V Afanas'ev, Dmitry S Ischenko, Nikolai A Bazaleev and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Large-scale Pan Genomic Analysis ofEvolutionary bioinformatics online · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Using Omics to Study Leprosy, Tuberculosis, and Other Mycobacterial Diseases.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Complete Genome Sequencing ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Elena N IlinaResearch Institute of Physical-Chemical Medicine, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Egor A Shitikov
Larisa N Ikryannikova
Dmitry G Alekseev
Dmitri E Kamashev
Maja V Malakhova
Tatjana V Parfenova
Maxim V Afanas'ev
Dmitry S Ischenko
Nikolai A Bazaleev
Tatjana G Smirnova
Elena E Larionova
Larisa N Chernousova
Alexey V Beletsky
Andrei V Mardanov
Nikolai V Ravin
Konstantin G Skryabin
Vadim M Govorun
Research Institute of Physical Chemical Medicine · RUBioengineering Center · RUCentral Scientific Research Institute of Tuberculosis Russian Academy of Medical Sciences · RUMoscow Institute of Physics and Technology · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tuberculosis caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) strains is a growing problem in many countries. The availability of the complete nucleotide sequences of several MTB genomes allows to use the comparative genomics as a tool to study the relationships of strains and differences in their evolutionary history including acquisition of drug-resistance. In our work, we sequenced three genomes of Russian MTB strains of different phenotypes--drug susceptible, MDR and XDR. Of them, MDR and XDR strains were collected in Tomsk (Siberia, Russia) during the local TB outbreak in 1998-1999 and belonged to rare KQ and KY families in accordance with IS6110 typing, which are considered endemic for Russia. Based on phylogenetic analysis, our isolates belonged to different genetic families, Beijing, Ural and LAM, which made the direct comparison of their genomes impossible. For this reason we performed their comparison in the broader context of all M. tuberculosis genomes available in GenBank. The list of unique individual non-synonymous SNPs for each sequenced isolate was formed by comparison with all SNPs detected within the same phylogenetic group. For further functional analysis, all proteins with unique SNPs were ascribed to 20 different functional classes based on Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG). We have confirmed drug resistant status of our isolates that harbored almost all known drug-resistance associated mutations. Unique SNPs of an XDR isolate CTRI-4(XDR), belonging to a Beijing family were compared in more detail with SNPs of additional 14 Russian XDR strains of the same family. Only type specific mutations in genes of repair, replication and recombination system (COG category L) were found common within this group. Probably the other unique SNPs discovered in CTRI-4(XDR) may have an important role in adaptation of this microorganism to its surrounding and in escape from antituberculosis drugs treatment.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsComparative Genomic HybridizationDNA, BacterialExtensively Drug-Resistant TuberculosisGenome, BacterialHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMolecular Sequence DataMycobacterium tuberculosisPhenotypePhylogenyRussiaSiberiaAntitubercular AgentsDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID23437175
PMCPMC3577857
OpenAlexW2000705873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.