SynthesisPloS one2013
The effect of anesthetic technique on survival in human cancers: a meta-analysis of retrospective and prospective studies.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
General Anesthesia Combined With Epidural Anesthesia Mitigates the Surgical Stress-related Immunosuppression in Patients With Colorectal Cancer
Impact of Epidural Anesthesia-analgesia on Long-term Outcome in Elderly Patients After Surgery: 5-year Follow-up of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Impact of Epidural Anesthesia-analgesia on Long-term Outcomes in Elderly Patients After Surgery: 5-year Follow-up of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 141 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of epidural anesthesia on the prognosis of ovarian cancer-a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC anesthesiology · 2023Pooled it
- Effect of combined epidural-general anesthesia on long-term survival of patients with colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.International journal of colorectal disease · 2022Pooled it
- The effect of neuraxial anesthesia on cancer recurrence and survival after cancer surgery: an updated meta-analysis.Oncotarget · 2016Pooled it
- Regional anesthesia/analgesia and the risk of cancer recurrence and mortality after prostatectomy: a meta-analysis.Pain management · 2015Pooled it
- [The effect of peridural analgesia on long-term survival after surgery in patients with colorectal cancer : A systematic meta-analysis].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2015Pooled it
- Anaesthetic techniques for risk of malignant tumour recurrence.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Can regional anesthesia and analgesia prolong cancer survival after orthopaedic oncologic surgery?Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2014Pooled it
- Combined anesthesia shows better curative effect and less perioperative neuroendocrine disorder than general anesthesia in early stage NSCLC patients.The Journal of international medical research · 2019Trial
- Post-mastectomy cancer recurrence with and without a continuous paravertebral block in the immediate postoperative period: a prospective multi-year follow-up pilot study of a randomized, triple-masked, placebo-controlled investigation.Journal of anesthesia · 2017Trial
- Treatment with methylnaltrexone is associated with increased survival in patients with advanced cancer.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2016Trial
- General anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia ameliorates the effect of fast-track surgery by mitigating immunosuppression and facilitating intestinal functional recovery in colon cancer patients.International journal of colorectal disease · 2015Trial
- General and Regional Anaesthesia in Cancer Surgery: A 20-year Bibliometric Analysis.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2026Article
- Anesthetic Approaches and Their Impact on Cancer Recurrence and Metastasis: A Comprehensive Review.Cancers · 2024Review
- Trial watch: local anesthetics in cancer therapy.Oncoimmunology · 2024Article
- Local anesthetics and immunotherapy: a novel combination to fight cancer.Seminars in immunopathology · 2023Review
- Effect of Opioid Receptor Activation and Blockage on the Progression and Response to Treatment of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Thoracic epidural analgesia vs. patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for patients undergoing open or laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: An observational study.European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care · 2023Article
- Influence of Perioperative Anesthesia on Cancer Recurrence: from Basic Science to Clinical Practice.Current oncology reports · 2023Review
- Opioids in cancer: The κ‑opioid receptor (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2022Review
- Antitumor Anesthetic Strategy in the Perioperatory Period of the Oncological Patient: A Review.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Animal models have shown that regional anesthesia (combined with or without general anesthesia) would attenuate the surgical stress response by preserving immune function and result in better long-term outcome. In order to test the hypothesis that cancer patients who had surgery with epidural anesthesia (EA) would have better outcome (either overall survival [OS] or recurrence-free survival [RFS]) than those who were general anesthesia (GA), we performed this meta-analysis. By searching relevant literature, a total of 14 studies containing 18 sub-studies (seven in OS analysis and eleven in RFS analysis) were identified and meta-analyzed. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of association. For OS, the random-effects model was used to analyze the data and demonstrated an OS benefit in favor of EA compared with GA alone (HR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.74-0.96, P = 0.013). The influence analysis showed the robustness of the results. Specifically, a significantly positive association between EA and improved OS was observed in colorectal cancer (HR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.43-0.99, P = 0.045). For RFS, the random-effects model was used to analyze the data and no significant relationship between RFS benefit and EA (HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.64-1.22, P = 0.457) was detected. In conclusion, our meta-analysis suggests that epidural anesthesia and/or analgesia might be associated with improved overall survival in patients with operable cancer undergoing surgery (especially in colorectal cancer), but it does not support an association between epidural anesthesia and cancer control. Prospective studies are needed to determine whether the association between epidural use and survival is causative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.