ArticlePloS one2013
Morphology-based prediction of osteogenic differentiation potential of human mesenchymal stem cells.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
65 citing papers in PubMed.
- Glial Cell Niche Induces Astrocytic Differentiation of NSCs via the BMP4-Smad1/5/8 Signaling Pathway.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- A continuous adhesion-enhanced osteogenic pathway in artificial scaffold drives cellular infiltration and condensed mineralization for rapid bone regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Standard Methods for Quality Control in Cell-Based Medicinal Products and their Validation for Clinical Applications.Advanced biomedical research · 2026Review
- Morphometric prediction of mesenchymal stromal cell-like immunosuppressive capacity of human hair follicle dermal sheath cup cells: an implication for regenerative medicine in hair loss diseases.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
- Micropatterning and Nanodropletting of Titanium by Shifted Surface Laser Texturing Significantly Enhances In Vitro Osteogenesis of Healthy and Osteoporotic Mesenchymal Stromal Cells.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Application of Machine Learning in Predicting Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- AI-Driven Quality Monitoring and Control in Stem Cell Cultures: A Comprehensive Review.Biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- Early and non-destructive prediction of the differentiation efficiency of human induced pluripotent stem cells using imaging and machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Metabolic markers detect early ostedifferentiation of mesenchymal stem cells from multiple donors.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
- Determination and validation of design space for mesenchymal stem cell cultivation processes using prediction intervals.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Recent advances in artificial intelligent strategies for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024Review
- High-viscosity driven modulation of biomechanical properties of human mesenchymal stem cells promotes osteogenic lineage.Materials today. Bio · 2024Article
- Robotics-Driven Manufacturing of Cartilaginous Microtissues for Skeletal Tissue Engineering Applications.Stem cells translational medicine · 2024Article
- Advancements in Umbilical Cord Biobanking: A Comprehensive Review of Current Trends and Future Prospects.Stem cells and cloning : advances and applications · 2024Review
- Deep Learning Model for Predicting Airway Organoid Differentiation.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2023Article
- Osteoinductive and Osteogenic Capacity of Freeze-Dried Bovine Bone Compared to Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral Scaffold in Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell Culture: An In Vitro Study.European journal of dentistry · 2023Article
- Understanding the interplay of membrane trafficking, cell surface mechanics, and stem cell differentiation.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2023Review
- Morphology-based deep learning approach for predicting adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs).Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Article
- Volumetric imaging of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) for non-destructive quantification of 3D cell culture growth.PloS one · 2023Article
- Cell morphology as a biological fingerprint of chondrocyte phenotype in control and inflammatory conditions.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (hBMSCs) are widely used cell source for clinical bone regeneration. Achieving the greatest therapeutic effect is dependent on the osteogenic differentiation potential of the stem cells to be implanted. However, there are still no practical methods to characterize such potential non-invasively or previously. Monitoring cellular morphology is a practical and non-invasive approach for evaluating osteogenic potential. Unfortunately, such image-based approaches had been historically qualitative and requiring experienced interpretation. By combining the non-invasive attributes of microscopy with the latest technology allowing higher throughput and quantitative imaging metrics, we studied the applicability of morphometric features to quantitatively predict cellular osteogenic potential. We applied computational machine learning, combining cell morphology features with their corresponding biochemical osteogenic assay results, to develop prediction model of osteogenic differentiation. Using a dataset of 9,990 images automatically acquired by BioStation CT during osteogenic differentiation culture of hBMSCs, 666 morphometric features were extracted as parameters. Two commonly used osteogenic markers, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and calcium deposition were measured experimentally, and used as the true biological differentiation status to validate the prediction accuracy. Using time-course morphological features throughout differentiation culture, the prediction results highly correlated with the experimentally defined differentiation marker values (R>0.89 for both marker predictions). The clinical applicability of our morphology-based prediction was further examined with two scenarios: one using only historical cell images and the other using both historical images together with the patient's own cell images to predict a new patient's cellular potential. The prediction accuracy was found to be greatly enhanced by incorporation of patients' own cell features in the modeling, indicating the practical strategy for clinical usage. Consequently, our results provide strong evidence for the feasibility of using a quantitative time series of phase-contrast cellular morphology for non-invasive cell quality prediction in regenerative medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.