ArticlePLoS genetics2013
Properties and modeling of GWAS when complex disease risk is due to non-complementing, deleterious mutations in genes of large effect.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.
- What has population genomics told us about the dynamics of selection and plant adaptation?Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Review
- Leveraging low-cost short-read sequencing: revolutionizing complex trait genetics.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- A gene-based model of fitness and its implications for genetic variation: linkage disequilibrium.Genetics · 2025Article
- A gene-based model of fitness and its implications for genetic variation: Linkage disequilibrium.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Adaptation in Outbred Sexual Yeast is Repeatable, Polygenic and Favors Rare Haplotypes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- The utility of a closed breeding colony of Peromyscus leucopus for dissecting complex traits.Genetics · 2022Article
- Powerful, efficient QTL mapping in Drosophila melanogaster using bulked phenotyping and pooled sequencing.Genetics · 2022Article
- Genetic control of tracheid properties in Norway spruce wood.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Two Synthetic 18-Way Outcrossed Populations of Diploid Budding Yeast with Utility for Complex Trait Dissection.Genetics · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
- Structural variants exhibit widespread allelic heterogeneity and shape variation in complex traits.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Extreme Polygenicity of Complex Traits Is Explained by Negative Selection.American journal of human genetics · 2019Article
- Evaluating the Potential of Younger Cases and Older Controls Cohorts to Improve Discovery Power in Genome-Wide Association Studies of Late-Onset Diseases.Journal of personalized medicine · 2019Article
- Inferring the Nature of Missing Heritability in Human Traits Using Data from the GWAS Catalog.Genetics · 2019Article
- Age-related late-onset disease heritability patterns and implications for genome-wide association studies.PeerJ · 2019Article
- Comparative Genomics Approaches Accurately Predict Deleterious Variants in Plants.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018Article
- The Beavis Effect in Next-Generation Mapping Panels inG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017Article
- Loci Contributing to Boric Acid Toxicity in Two Reference Populations ofG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017Article
- Excess of genomic defects in a woolly mammoth on Wrangel island.PLoS genetics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Current genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have high power to detect intermediate frequency SNPs making modest contributions to complex disease, but they are underpowered to detect rare alleles of large effect (RALE). This has led to speculation that the bulk of variation for most complex diseases is due to RALE. One concern with existing models of RALE is that they do not make explicit assumptions about the evolution of a phenotype and its molecular basis. Rather, much of the existing literature relies on arbitrary mapping of phenotypes onto genotypes obtained either from standard population-genetic simulation tools or from non-genetic models. We introduce a novel simulation of a 100-kilobase gene region, based on the standard definition of a gene, in which mutations are unconditionally deleterious, are continuously arising, have partially recessive and non-complementing effects on phenotype (analogous to what is widely observed for most Mendelian disorders), and are interspersed with neutral markers that can be genotyped. Genes evolving according to this model exhibit a characteristic GWAS signature consisting of an excess of marginally significant markers. Existing tests for an excess burden of rare alleles in cases have low power while a simple new statistic has high power to identify disease genes evolving under our model. The structure of linkage disequilibrium between causative mutations and significantly associated markers under our model differs fundamentally from that seen when rare causative markers are assumed to be neutral. Rather than tagging single haplotypes bearing a large number of rare causative alleles, we find that significant SNPs in a GWAS tend to tag single causative mutations of small effect relative to other mutations in the same gene. Our results emphasize the importance of evaluating the power to detect associations under models that are genetically and evolutionarily motivated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.