ArticleMolecular biotechnology2013
Development and padronization of three multiplex PCRs for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis, Toxoplasma gondii, herpes simplex viruses 1 and 2, and Cytomegalovirus.
Article in Molecular biotechnology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Can Wastewater Surveillance Enhance Genomic Tracking of Climate-Driven Pathogens?Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Congenital Toxoplasmosis Diagnosis: Current Approaches and New Insights.Acta parasitologica · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To develop multiplex PCRs (mPCRs) that allows simultaneous diagnosis of the infectious agents Chlamydia trachomatis, Toxoplasma gondii, HSV 1/2, and Cytomegalovirus (CMV). The study included patients with clinical suspicion of these agents, and clinical samples were blood, cerebrospinal fluid, urine, vaginal swabs, and amniotic fluid. After the extraction of DNA, this was used as a template in amplification by PCR of selected genes. The following conditions were tested: primer concentration, MgCl2 concentration, and annealing temperature. Three mPCRs were developed: multiplex I (CMV, HSV 1/2), multiplex II (CMV, HSV 1/2, T. gondii), and multiplex III (C. trachomatis, T. gondii, HSV 1/2, and CMV). The primer pairs used were shown to be specific for each infectious agent, and the specificity of mPCR assays was 100 %. Both the reactions of the monoplex PCR and mPCR produced a detection limit of 2 × 10(-5) to 6 × 10(-7) ng/μl of different DNAs. Upon conclusion, amplified products of expected size were obtained in 3 different reactions, and all the infectious agents were detected simultaneously in each mPCR. The concordant results of the study suggest that mPCR can be a powerful tool to improve the diagnostics of infectious diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.