ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2013
Genome sequencing identifies two nearly unchanged strains of persistent Listeria monocytogenes isolated at two different fish processing plants sampled 6 years apart.
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed, 125 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biofilm forming capacity, sanitizer tolerance, and genetic characterization of persistent and non-persistentBiofilm · 2026Article
- Bioprotective Strategies to ControlInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Review
- Retrospective Analysis of Historical Listeria monocytogenes Clinical Isolates, New York, USA, 2000-2021Emerging infectious diseases · 2025Review
- Review
- Review
- Population structure and gene flux ofMicrobial genomics · 2025Article
- Listeria monocytogenes in the seafood industry: Exploring contamination sources, outbreaks, antibiotic susceptibility and genetic diversity.MicrobiologyOpen · 2024Review
- Genetic diversity ofAIMS microbiology · 2024Article
- Persistence of microbiological hazards in food and feed production and processing environments.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024Article
- Review
- Genetic population structure ofHeliyon · 2023Article
- Identification by High-Throughput Real-Time PCR of 30 Major Circulating Listeria monocytogenes Clonal Complexes in Europe.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Prevalence and contamination patterns ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Intraspecies characterization of bacteria via evolutionary modeling of protein domains.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- PervasiveApplied and environmental microbiology · 2022Review
- A European-wide dataset to uncover adaptive traits of Listeria monocytogenes to diverse ecological niches.Scientific data · 2022Article
- Application of Whole Genome Sequencing to Aid in Deciphering the Persistence Potential ofMicroorganisms · 2021Review
- Molecular Typing ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Landscape of Stress Response and Virulence Genes AmongFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Listeria monocytogenes is a food-borne human-pathogenic bacterium that can cause infections with a high mortality rate. It has a remarkable ability to persist in food processing facilities. Here we report the genome sequences for two L. monocytogenes strains (N53-1 and La111) that were isolated 6 years apart from two different Danish fish processers. Both strains are of serotype 1/2a and belong to a highly persistent DNA subtype (random amplified polymorphic DNA [RAPD] type 9). We demonstrate using in silico analyses that both strains belong to the multilocus sequence typing (MLST) type ST121 that has been isolated as a persistent subtype in several European countries. The purpose of this study was to use genome analyses to identify genes or proteins that could contribute to persistence. In a genome comparison, the two persistent strains were extremely similar and collectively differed from the reference lineage II strain, EGD-e. Also, they differed markedly from a lineage I strain (F2365). On the proteome level, the two strains were almost identical, with a predicted protein homology of 99.94%, differing at only 2 proteins. No single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) differences were seen between the two strains; in contrast, N53-1 and La111 differed from the EGD-e reference strain by 3,942 and 3,471 SNPs, respectively. We included a persistent L. monocytogenes strain from the United States (F6854) in our comparisons. Compared to nonpersistent strains, all three persistent strains were distinguished by two genome deletions: one, of 2,472 bp, typically contains the gene for inlF, and the other, of 3,017 bp, includes three genes potentially related to bacteriocin production and transport (lmo2774, lmo2775, and the 3'-terminal part of lmo2776). Further studies of highly persistent strains are required to determine if the absence of these genes promotes persistence. While the genome comparison did not point to a clear physiological explanation of the persistent phenotype, the remarkable similarity between the two strains indicates that subtypes with specific traits are selected for in the food processing environment and that particular genetic and physiological factors are responsible for the persistent phenotype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.