Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23435726›Full record

ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2013

Virtual autopsy: time for a clinical trial.

Michael S Pollanen, Noel Woodford

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The BrainboxBrain communications · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Virtual autopsy.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2013
    Article
  9. Post-mortem cross-sectional imaging: are we running before we can walk?Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2013
    Article
  10. Virtual autopsy.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2013
    Article
  11. Virtual autopsy.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2013
    Article
  12. Virtual autopsy.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2013
    Article
  13. Virtual autopsy.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2013
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael S PollanenOntario Forensic Pathology Service, Toronto, Canada. Michael.Pollanen@ontario.ca
Noel Woodford

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedAutopsyCause of DeathForensic PathologyHumansPredictive Value of TestsRisk Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.